[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":58},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-index":3},[4,10,15,21,26,31,36,42,47,52],{"path":5,"tool":6,"cardSummary":7,"category":8,"categoryOrder":9,"order":9},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fnotebooklm-vs-agent-bayes","NotebookLM","Google's free notebook is excellent at answering questions about your sources. It is not built to hold a thesis argument together over six months.","Own-corpus research workspaces",1,{"path":11,"tool":12,"cardSummary":13,"category":8,"categoryOrder":9,"order":14},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fatlas-vs-agent-bayes","Atlas","The closest structural competitor. Both read only your own PDFs. The difference is whether the map holds papers or holds claims.",2,{"path":16,"tool":17,"cardSummary":18,"category":19,"categoryOrder":14,"order":20},"\u002Fcompare\u002Felicit-vs-agent-bayes","Elicit","Built for screening thousands of papers into tables. If your problem is depth on 60 papers rather than breadth across 5,000, the shapes do not match.","Answer engines over the open literature",3,{"path":22,"tool":23,"cardSummary":24,"category":19,"categoryOrder":14,"order":25},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fconsensus-vs-agent-bayes","Consensus","The Consensus Meter answers 'does the field agree' across 220 million papers. It does not leave you with anything you can build on.",4,{"path":27,"tool":28,"cardSummary":29,"category":19,"categoryOrder":14,"order":30},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fscispace-vs-agent-bayes","SciSpace","The broadest feature set in the category at the lowest price. Breadth is the product, and depth on any one job is the trade.",5,{"path":32,"tool":33,"cardSummary":34,"category":19,"categoryOrder":14,"order":35},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fscite-vs-agent-bayes","scite.ai","Classifies 1.2 billion citation statements as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning. Answers a question Agent Bayes cannot, and does not answer the one it can.",6,{"path":37,"tool":38,"cardSummary":39,"category":40,"categoryOrder":20,"order":41},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fconnected-papers-vs-agent-bayes","Connected Papers","The fastest way to see the shape of an unfamiliar subfield. It never opens a PDF, which is where Agent Bayes starts.","Discovery and citation mapping",7,{"path":43,"tool":44,"cardSummary":45,"category":40,"categoryOrder":20,"order":46},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fresearchrabbit-vs-agent-bayes","ResearchRabbit","Free, excellent at finding papers and watching a topic. It stops at the abstract, which is where the reading problem starts.",8,{"path":48,"tool":49,"cardSummary":50,"category":40,"categoryOrder":20,"order":51},"\u002Fcompare\u002Flitmaps-vs-agent-bayes","Litmaps","Seed a map, then get told when relevant new work appears. Excellent at staying current, and it never reads a paper.",9,{"path":53,"tool":54,"cardSummary":55,"category":56,"categoryOrder":25,"order":57},"\u002Fcompare\u002Fchatgpt-deep-research-vs-agent-bayes","ChatGPT Deep Research","Reads the open web for tens of minutes and writes a long cited report. It cannot open the paywalled papers your field actually runs on.","General research agents",10,1785766064932]