[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":431},["ShallowReactive",2],{"answers-\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original":3,"answers-cluster-research-gaps":109,"answers-related-\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original":150},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"body":7,"cluster":72,"description":73,"extension":74,"faq":75,"heading":78,"intro":66,"kind":79,"meta":80,"navigation":81,"order":70,"outbound":82,"path":89,"primaryQuery":90,"product":91,"related":92,"seo":95,"sources":96,"stem":107,"updated":100,"__hash__":108},"answers\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original.md","How Do You Know a Research Gap Is Original?","Search for the study you intend to do, not for your topic. Use the terms a paper reporting your result would use in its title and abstract, search dissertation repositories and preprint servers as well as journals, and ask two people in the field. Topic searches miss the paper that already did it.",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":65},"minimark",[10,14,17,20,23,26,29,34,37,40,43,47,50,53,56,59,62],[11,12,13],"p",{},"Originality in a doctorate is a lower bar than most candidates assume and a different bar than they imagine. It does not require that nobody has worked nearby. It requires a contribution to knowledge that did not exist before, which can be a new result, a new method, a new context, a new synthesis, or a well-executed test of something previously assumed.",[11,15,16],{},"The check that actually finds collisions is a search for your intended paper rather than your topic. Write the title your finished study would have. Extract the distinctive terms from it. Search those. A topic search returns the field, which you already know, while a title search returns the specific study, which is what you are worried about.",[11,18,19],{},"It also helps to know which kind of gap you are claiming, because \"nobody has done this\" is only one of them. Lingard sorts gaps into four types: a plain knowledge deficit, a methodological or philosophical shortcoming, an unresolved controversy, and a pervasive assumption nobody has tested. The worked examples are the absence of any study relating longitudinal integrated clerkships to medical student abuse, research read through a cognitivist lens while a humanist reading is neglected, open disagreement over how professionalism should be defined, and the untested belief that technology will fix teamwork problems (Lingard, 2018, Part I, pp. 48-49). Three of those four survive even when close work already exists, so identify which one you are making before you conclude you have been scooped.",[11,21,22],{},"Lingard also recommends taking notes on how each paper relates to the others, not only on what each one contributes, because a gap usually appears as a pattern across studies rather than as a missing keyword (Lingard, 2018, Part I, p. 49). The review you write should carry only the material needed to position your own contribution as the next turn in that conversation (Lingard, 2018, Part I, pp. 47-48).",[11,24,25],{},"Cover the places where finished work sits before it is visible. Dissertation and thesis repositories hold years of research that never becomes a journal article. Preprint servers hold the work that is currently in review, which is precisely the work most likely to scoop you. Conference programmes hold the work that is currently being done.",[11,27,28],{},"Then ask people. Two conversations with researchers active in the area will surface things no database will, including the study someone abandoned for reasons you would rather learn now.",[30,31,33],"h2",{"id":32},"what-do-i-do-if-someone-publishes-my-idea-while-i-am-working-on-it","What do I do if someone publishes my idea while I am working on it?",[11,35,36],{},"First, read it properly rather than panicking. Overlap is almost never total. They used a different sample, measure, setting, or theoretical lens, and the difference is now your contribution, stated explicitly. A published paper on your question also proves the question was worth asking.",[11,38,39],{},"Practically, this usually means a reframing rather than a restart. Your study becomes the replication that tests whether their finding transfers, or the extension that adds the mechanism they could not test, or the contrast that shows the result depends on a design choice they did not examine. All three are publishable and all three are defensible in a viva.",[11,41,42],{},"Tell your supervisor the week you find out, not the month before submission. The reframing is easy early and painful late, and supervisors have seen this many times.",[30,44,46],{"id":45},"how-thorough-does-an-originality-check-need-to-be","How thorough does an originality check need to be?",[11,48,49],{},"Thorough enough that an examiner naming a paper you have not read would be a surprise. In practice: a full database search, forward and backward citation chasing on the closest three works, one preprint server, one dissertation index, and a conversation with someone who has been in the field longer than you.",[11,51,52],{},"Do not let one search platform's silence stand as proof. Across six systematic reviews, Haddaway and colleagues found Google Scholar coverage of the included studies ranging from 68.5% at worst, meaning it missed 31.5% of the studies that review relied on, up to 100% in the review with the smallest evidence base of 37 studies, with the rest between 94.3% and 100% (Haddaway et al., 2015, pp. 11, 17). The same authors argue for searching grey literature, including theses, organisational reports, and government papers, because positive and statistically significant results are more likely to be published than negative ones (Haddaway et al., 2015, p. 3).",[11,54,55],{},"Then try to break your own claim with a deliberately wider search. Bramer and colleagues suggest running a more sensitive version of your strategy, then examining only what the second strategy found and the first missed, and judging whether those extra references are relevant. Add synonyms picked up from the highest ranked results, and check anything citation chasing turns up. If a paper was sitting in the database and your strategy simply did not retrieve it, put the missing term in and run it again (Bramer et al., 2018, pp. 536, 538).",[11,57,58],{},"Repeat the check at least twice more before submission, since three years is long enough for the field to move. Put it in the calendar rather than trusting yourself to remember, because this is exactly the task that gets postponed when writing is going badly.",[11,60,61],{},"Perfect coverage is not available and chasing it is a way of not starting. The obligation is diligence and honesty about scope, not omniscience.",[11,63,64],{},"Bramer and colleagues say plainly that exhaustiveness cannot be established, because the number of relevant articles is unknown, even though searches from 73 reviews built with their method performed comparably to searches from 258 reviews that involved information specialists at other Dutch academic hospitals, and took less development time (Bramer et al., 2018, p. 540). So write the claim to match what you actually did. State the databases, terms, citation trails, and grey literature you searched and the date you searched them, then say which of the four gap types your study addresses (Lingard, 2018, Part I, p. 49). That claim is defensible under questioning. \"Nothing came up\" is not.",{"title":66,"searchDepth":67,"depth":67,"links":68},"",4,[69,71],{"id":32,"depth":70,"text":33},2,{"id":45,"depth":70,"text":46},"research-gaps","How to check that a research gap has not already been filled, what to do if someone publishes your idea first, and how thorough the originality check has to be.","md",[76,77],{"q":33,"a":36},{"q":46,"a":49},"How do I know if my research gap is original?","answer",{},true,[83,86],{"label":84,"to":85},"Gap finding as a workflow","\u002Fdocs\u002Fresearch-workflows\u002Fgap-finding",{"label":87,"to":88},"Hypothesis generation and testing","\u002Fdocs\u002Fresearch-workflows\u002Fhypothesis-generation-and-testing","\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original","how do i know if my research gap is original",null,[93,94],"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fkeep-up-with-new-papers",{"title":5,"description":73},[97,101,104],{"label":98,"url":99,"checked":100},"Lingard, Writing an effective literature review: Part I: Mapping the gap, Perspectives on Medical Education (2018)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs40037-017-0401-x","2026-08-06",{"label":102,"url":103,"checked":100},"Haddaway et al., The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching, PLoS One (2015)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pone.0138237",{"label":105,"url":106,"checked":100},"Bramer et al., A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches, Journal of the Medical Library Association (2018)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5195\u002Fjmla.2018.283","answers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original","Cfk9vzrzXrPAHxSkTG8smDMVgKDzHPkBhV6KIZukaWM",[110,115,116,121,125,130,135,140,145],{"path":111,"heading":112,"description":113,"order":114},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Ffind-a-research-gap","How do I identify a research gap in the literature?","How to identify a research gap in the literature, the different kinds of gap that exist, and how to tell a real one from a topic nobody has bothered to publish on.",1,{"path":89,"heading":78,"description":73,"order":70},{"path":117,"heading":118,"description":119,"order":120},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwrite-a-research-gap-statement","How do I write a research gap statement?","How to write a research gap statement that holds up, which phrasings make a gap sound weak or overclaimed, and how long the statement should actually be.",3,{"path":122,"heading":123,"description":124,"order":67},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fturn-a-topic-into-a-research-question","How do I turn a research topic into a research question?","How to convert a broad research topic into an answerable research question, how narrow it needs to be, and the difference between a question and a research aim.",{"path":126,"heading":127,"description":128,"order":129},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwhat-makes-a-good-research-question","What makes a good research question in a PhD thesis?","What separates a doctoral research question from a masters one, how many questions a thesis should have, and whether sub-questions should map onto chapters.",5,{"path":131,"heading":132,"description":133,"order":134},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-or-hypothesis","What is the difference between a research question and a hypothesis?","The difference between a research question and a hypothesis, whether a qualitative study can have one, and when a project genuinely needs both.",6,{"path":136,"heading":137,"description":138,"order":139},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-changed-mid-phd","Can a research question change during a PhD?","Whether a research question can change during a PhD, how to justify the change to a supervisor or committee, and what happens to work built on the old question.",7,{"path":141,"heading":142,"description":143,"order":144},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fnarrow-a-broad-research-question","How do I narrow down a research question that is too broad?","How to narrow a research question that is too broad, which parts of a question you can narrow on, and how to tell when you have gone too far the other way.",8,{"path":146,"heading":147,"description":148,"order":149},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fchoose-a-theoretical-framework","How do I choose a theoretical framework for my thesis?","How to choose a theoretical framework for a thesis, the difference between a theoretical and a conceptual framework, and whether you can use more than one.",9,[151,154,157,160,163,166,169,172,175,178,181,184,187,190,193,196,199,202,205,208,211,214,217,220,223,226,229,232,235,238,241,244,247,250,253,256,259,262,265,268,271,274,277,280,283,286,289,292,295,298,301,304,307,310,313,316,319,322,325,328,331,334,337,340,342,345,348,351,354,357,359,362,365,368,371,374,377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,399,400,401,402,403,404,405,406,407,410,413,416,419,422,425,428],{"path":152,"heading":153},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fdraft-without-stopping-for-citations","How do I draft when I keep stopping to look up citations?",{"path":155,"heading":156},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fhow-long-should-a-literature-review-chapter-be","How long should a literature review chapter be?",{"path":158,"heading":159},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fparaphrase-without-plagiarizing","How do I paraphrase a source without plagiarizing?",{"path":161,"heading":162},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fstructure-a-phd-thesis","How do I structure a PhD thesis chapter by chapter?",{"path":164,"heading":165},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fthesis-by-publication-or-monograph","Should I do a thesis by publication or a monograph?",{"path":167,"heading":168},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-discussion-section","How do I write a discussion section without repeating the results?",{"path":170,"heading":171},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-methodology-chapter","How do I write a methodology chapter?",{"path":173,"heading":174},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-thesis-introduction","How do I write a thesis introduction?",{"path":176,"heading":177},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-an-abstract","How do I write an abstract for a research paper?",{"path":179,"heading":180},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-consistently-during-a-phd","How do I write consistently during a PhD?",{"path":182,"heading":183},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fai-for-systematic-review-screening","Can I use AI for screening in a systematic review?",{"path":185,"heading":186},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fare-ai-detectors-reliable","Are AI detectors reliable?",{"path":188,"heading":189},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-an-ai-be-an-author","Can an AI tool be listed as an author on a paper?",{"path":191,"heading":192},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-i-use-ai-for-a-literature-review","Can I use AI for a literature review?",{"path":194,"heading":195},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","Can I trust AI summaries of research papers?",{"path":197,"heading":198},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fdisclose-ai-use-in-a-paper","Do I need to disclose AI use in a research paper?",{"path":200,"heading":201},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fhow-to-cite-chatgpt","How do I cite ChatGPT in APA 7?",{"path":203,"heading":204},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fis-using-chatgpt-plagiarism","Is using ChatGPT for academic writing plagiarism?",{"path":206,"heading":207},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-in-a-phd-thesis","Can I use AI in a PhD thesis?",{"path":209,"heading":210},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-to-write-a-peer-review","Can I use AI to help write a peer review?",{"path":212,"heading":213},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fverify-ai-generated-citations","How do I check whether AI-generated citations are real?",{"path":215,"heading":216},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-ai-answers-better-on-your-own-pdfs","Why does an AI answer better when it reads my own PDFs?",{"path":218,"heading":219},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-chatgpt-invents-references","Why does ChatGPT make up references?",{"path":221,"heading":222},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcheck-every-claim-against-its-citation","How do I check that every claim in my thesis is supported by its citation?",{"path":224,"heading":225},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcite-the-paper-you-read-or-the-original","Should I cite the paper I read or the original study it references?",{"path":227,"heading":228},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcited-source-does-not-say-that","What do I do when a paper's cited source does not support its claim?",{"path":230,"heading":231},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-paper-you-cannot-access","Can I cite a paper I cannot get hold of?",{"path":233,"heading":234},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","Is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice?",{"path":236,"heading":237},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fdo-i-need-to-cite-everything","Do I need to cite absolutely everything in a thesis?",{"path":239,"heading":240},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fhow-much-self-citation","How much self-citation is acceptable?",{"path":242,"heading":243},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fjournal-page-number-or-pdf-page-number","Do I use the journal page number or the PDF page number in a citation?",{"path":245,"heading":246},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fquoting-a-source-in-another-language","How do I quote a source in another language in an English thesis?",{"path":248,"heading":249},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fwhere-does-the-citation-go","Where should a citation go when only one clause in a sentence needs support?",{"path":251,"heading":252},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fyou-described-a-result-too-broadly","How do I fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly?",{"path":254,"heading":255},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fzotero-or-mendeley","Should I use Zotero or Mendeley for a PhD?",{"path":257,"heading":258},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fbuild-a-synthesis-matrix","How do I build a synthesis matrix when my themes keep changing as I read?",{"path":260,"heading":261},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fkeep-a-literature-review-current","How do I keep a literature review current over a multi-year PhD?",{"path":263,"heading":264},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-synthesis-or-summary","How do I know if my literature review is synthesis or just a summary?",{"path":266,"heading":267},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-too-descriptive","What does it mean when a supervisor says a literature review is too descriptive?",{"path":269,"heading":270},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review","What is the difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review?",{"path":272,"heading":273},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Forganize-literature-review-by-argument","How do I organize a literature review by argument instead of by paper?",{"path":275,"heading":276},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Freview-that-leads-to-your-question","How do I write a literature review that leads logically to my research question?",{"path":278,"heading":279},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fscreening-abstracts-for-a-review","How do I screen hundreds of abstracts for a systematic review?",{"path":281,"heading":282},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fstudies-with-opposite-conclusions","What do I write when two studies on the same question reach opposite conclusions?",{"path":284,"heading":285},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsynthesis-matrix-into-paragraphs","How do I turn a synthesis matrix into literature review paragraphs?",{"path":287,"heading":288},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsystematic-review-search-strategy","How do I build a search strategy for a systematic review?",{"path":290,"heading":291},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fwhen-to-stop-searching-for-papers","How do I know when to stop searching for papers for a literature review?",{"path":293,"heading":294},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fdefend-your-methodology-in-a-viva","How do I defend my methodology in a viva?",{"path":296,"heading":297},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fimposter-syndrome-in-a-phd","How do I deal with imposter syndrome during a PhD?",{"path":299,"heading":300},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fplan-a-realistic-phd-timeline","How do I plan a realistic PhD timeline?",{"path":302,"heading":303},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fpostdoc-or-industry","Should I do a postdoc or go to industry after my PhD?",{"path":305,"heading":306},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fprepare-for-a-phd-viva","How do I prepare for a PhD viva?",{"path":308,"heading":309},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fstop-procrastinating-on-your-phd","How do I stop procrastinating on my PhD?",{"path":311,"heading":312},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhat-happens-if-a-viva-goes-badly","What happens if you fail a PhD viva?",{"path":314,"heading":315},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhen-your-supervisor-is-not-supportive","What do I do when my PhD supervisor is not supportive?",{"path":317,"heading":318},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwrite-an-academic-cv","How do I write an academic CV for a postdoc application?",{"path":320,"heading":321},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fchoose-a-journal","How do I choose a journal for my paper?",{"path":323,"heading":324},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fdo-you-pay-to-publish-open-access","Do I have to pay to publish open access?",{"path":326,"heading":327},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-author-order-is-decided","How is author order decided on a paper?",{"path":329,"heading":330},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-peer-review-works","How does journal peer review actually work?",{"path":332,"heading":333},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-to-cite-a-preprint","How do I cite a preprint?",{"path":335,"heading":336},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fjournal-submission-cover-letter","How do I write a cover letter for a journal submission?",{"path":338,"heading":339},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","How do I respond to peer reviewer comments?",{"path":93,"heading":341},"Should I post my paper as a preprint?",{"path":343,"heading":344},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fspot-a-predatory-journal","How do I tell if a journal is predatory?",{"path":346,"heading":347},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fwhy-papers-get-desk-rejected","Why was my paper desk rejected?",{"path":349,"heading":350},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ffind-the-paper-you-half-remember","How do I find a paper when I only remember the argument it made?",{"path":352,"heading":353},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhighlighting-pdfs-stops-working","Why can I never find my PDF highlights again?",{"path":355,"heading":356},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhow-many-papers-can-you-read-a-day","How many papers can a PhD student realistically read in a day?",{"path":94,"heading":358},"How do I keep up with new papers without reading everything?",{"path":360,"heading":361},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnon-english-studies-in-a-review","How do I include non-English studies in a literature review?",{"path":363,"heading":364},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnote-system-takes-too-long","What do I do when my note-taking system takes longer than reading the papers?",{"path":366,"heading":367},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Forganize-100-papers","How do I organize and extract information from more than 100 papers?",{"path":369,"heading":370},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Freading-papers-in-a-second-language","How do I read research papers efficiently when English is my second language?",{"path":372,"heading":373},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fremember-what-a-paper-said","How do I remember what was in papers I read months ago?",{"path":375,"heading":376},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Frestart-a-project-after-months-away","How do I get back into a research project after months away?",{"path":378,"heading":379},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftrack-connections-between-papers","How do I keep track of connections between papers?",{"path":381,"heading":382},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftriage-pdfs-before-reading","How do I triage 200 PDFs before deciding which ones to read in full?",{"path":384,"heading":385},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fanonymize-qualitative-data","How do I anonymize qualitative interview data?",{"path":387,"heading":388},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Ffair-data-principles-in-practice","What are the FAIR data principles?",{"path":390,"heading":391},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Forganize-research-data-files","How do I organize research data files?",{"path":393,"heading":394},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwhat-preregistration-is","What is preregistration in research?",{"path":396,"heading":397},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwrite-a-data-management-plan","How do I write a data management plan?",{"path":146,"heading":147},{"path":111,"heading":112},{"path":89,"heading":78},{"path":141,"heading":142},{"path":136,"heading":137},{"path":131,"heading":132},{"path":122,"heading":123},{"path":126,"heading":127},{"path":117,"heading":118},{"path":408,"heading":409},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fchoose-a-statistical-test","How do I choose which statistical test to use?",{"path":411,"heading":412},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-many-interviews-is-enough","How many interviews are enough for a qualitative study?",{"path":414,"heading":415},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-to-do-thematic-analysis","How do I do thematic analysis step by step?",{"path":417,"heading":418},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Finductive-or-deductive-coding","What is the difference between inductive and deductive thematic analysis?",{"path":420,"heading":421},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fintegrate-mixed-methods-data","How do I integrate qualitative and quantitative data in a mixed methods study?",{"path":423,"heading":424},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Frigour-in-qualitative-research","How do I show rigour in qualitative research?",{"path":426,"heading":427},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwhat-a-p-value-means","What does a p value actually mean?",{"path":429,"heading":430},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwork-out-your-sample-size","How do I calculate the sample size for a study?",1786014767787]