[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":434},["ShallowReactive",2],{"answers-\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint":3,"answers-cluster-publishing":110,"answers-related-\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint":155},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"body":7,"cluster":72,"description":73,"extension":74,"faq":75,"heading":78,"intro":66,"kind":79,"meta":80,"navigation":81,"order":82,"outbound":83,"path":90,"primaryQuery":91,"product":92,"related":93,"seo":96,"sources":97,"stem":108,"updated":101,"__hash__":109},"answers\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint.md","Should You Post a Preprint?","In most fields yes, and check your target journal first. Preprints establish priority, make the work citable immediately, and often attract useful comments before review. The main reasons not to are a journal that prohibits them, a patent application pending, or sensitive findings that need review before circulating.",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":65},"minimark",[10,14,17,20,23,26,29,32,37,40,43,46,49,53,56,59,62],[11,12,13],"p",{},"The case for posting is mostly about time. Peer review takes months, and during those months your finding does not exist as far as anyone else is concerned. A preprint makes it citable immediately, timestamps your priority if someone is working on the same question, and lets people who would use the result actually use it.",[11,15,16],{},"The speed is literal. bioRxiv, PeerJ Preprints, and the quantitative biology section of arXiv normally post a submission publicly within 24 hours, and the timestamp cannot be edited afterwards (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 2). The scale is not marginal either. arXiv started in 1991 for physics and had passed a million preprints by 2017, covering mathematics, computer science, and quantitative biology as well (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 1). A concrete case of what fast posting buys you: when a May 2016 claim that cell-phone radiation raised cancer rates in animals started circulating, the NIH released its data and internal reviews as a preprint within a day, and that preprint was downloaded 148,000 times in a little over five months (Bourne et al., 2017, pp. 3-4).",[11,18,19],{},"For doctoral candidates there is a second benefit that matters more than it should have to. Job and funding applications are read against a publication list, and a preprint is something concrete to point at while a paper sits in review. Several funders now accept them explicitly.",[11,21,22],{},"The funders named as accepting preprints in applications or reports include the NIH, the Wellcome Trust, and the Simons Foundation, with the Human Frontier Science Program, the UK Medical Research Council, the Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research allowing or encouraging them (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 4). Treatment across funders is variable, so check the specific call rather than assuming. The same source notes that preprints can add work for reviewers even while giving them a more informed picture of your output (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 3).",[11,24,25],{},"The reasons not to post are specific rather than general. A target journal that treats preprints as prior publication, which still exists in a few fields. A pending patent, where public disclosure can affect the application. Findings with public health or safety implications that should be reviewed before they circulate. Data-sharing agreements that restrict what can be released and when.",[11,27,28],{},"There is also a quality consideration worth taking seriously. A preprint is permanent and public with your name on it. Post work you would be willing to defend, not a draft you intend to fix after reviewers point at it.",[11,30,31],{},"How much you lose by skipping review first is genuinely contested. One argument is that peer review catches errors and improves papers, and that the public exposure of a preprint already discourages people from posting weak work (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 3). Against that, studies comparing arXiv and bioRxiv preprints with their final published versions found few substantive changes and similar reporting quality, though the authors are careful to say the value peer review adds is still hard to measure at scale (Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, 2020, p. 6). Neither position tells you to skip labelling. Mark the manuscript as a preprint that has not been peer reviewed, ask people who know the area to read it, and update the record when the journal version exists.",[33,34,36],"h2",{"id":35},"will-a-journal-still-accept-it-afterwards","Will a journal still accept it afterwards?",[11,38,39],{},"Almost all will, and a shrinking minority will not. Most publishers now explicitly permit preprint posting and many encourage it. Check the specific journal's policy before posting, since a small number of journals in some fields still treat a preprint as prior publication.",[11,41,42],{},"Publisher policy databases list preprint permissions per journal, and the journal's own author instructions are the definitive source. Check the version too, since some journals permit the submitted manuscript but not the accepted one.",[11,44,45],{},"The Sherpa\u002FRomeo database showed very few journals treating a preprint as prior publication, and life-science journals were moving the other way, adding preprint-friendly policies and direct submission routes from bioRxiv (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 4). Screening on the server side is light. bioRxiv's check is described as cursory, and it declines preprints that could damage human health, so the judgment about sensitive material is yours before you upload (Bourne et al., 2017, p. 5). Norms also differ by community, and services built to add review on top of preprints have had uneven uptake, including Academic Karma, which shut down in April 2019 (Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, 2020, p. 9).",[11,47,48],{},"If the journal requires it, disclose the preprint at submission and give the identifier. Concealing one is a much larger problem than posting one.",[33,50,52],{"id":51},"do-preprints-count-as-publications","Do preprints count as publications?",[11,54,55],{},"Not as peer-reviewed publications, and they do count for some purposes. Many funders accept preprints in grant applications and progress reports, and they are citable with a permanent identifier. On a CV, list them clearly as preprints rather than mixing them with reviewed articles.",[11,57,58],{},"Field norms vary. In some areas a preprint carries substantial weight and is read widely before the reviewed version appears. In others it is barely noticed, and its main value is the timestamp.",[11,60,61],{},"Update the record when the paper is published. Most servers let you link the published version, and doing so stops the preprint circulating as the current text after it has been superseded.",[11,63,64],{},"One practical note for co-authored work: get everyone's agreement before posting. A preprint is a public release, and a co-author who wanted to submit first has a reasonable objection you cannot undo afterwards.",{"title":66,"searchDepth":67,"depth":67,"links":68},"",4,[69,71],{"id":35,"depth":70,"text":36},2,{"id":51,"depth":70,"text":52},"publishing","Whether to post your paper as a preprint before submission, whether journals will still accept it afterwards, and whether preprints count as publications.","md",[76,77],{"q":36,"a":39},{"q":52,"a":55},"Should I post my paper as a preprint?","answer",{},true,7,[84,87],{"label":85,"to":86},"Outlining a paper from a map","\u002Fdocs\u002Fresearch-workflows\u002Foutlining-a-paper",{"label":88,"to":89},"AI verification of claims and citations","\u002Fdocs\u002Fcore-concepts\u002Fai-verification","\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","should i post my paper as a preprint",null,[94,95],"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwrite-an-academic-cv","\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original",{"title":5,"description":73},[98,102,105],{"label":99,"url":100,"checked":101},"Bourne et al., Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission, PLoS Computational Biology (2017)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1005473","2026-08-06",{"label":103,"url":104,"checked":101},"Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, The limitations to our understanding of peer review, Research Integrity and Peer Review (2020)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1186\u002Fs41073-020-00092-1",{"label":106,"url":107,"checked":101},"Tocco et al., Variability in article processing charges of open-access publishing across medical specialties, PLoS One (2025)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pone.0320684","answers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","VYZYvAHZwZCy4u96eGM34WuRr3AFJUL_VIKgmYySQNQ",[111,116,120,125,129,134,139,140,145,150],{"path":112,"heading":113,"description":114,"order":115},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fchoose-a-journal","How do I choose a journal for my paper?","How to choose a journal that will actually consider your paper, whether impact factor matters at your career stage, and how to read a scope statement properly.",1,{"path":117,"heading":118,"description":119,"order":70},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fspot-a-predatory-journal","How do I tell if a journal is predatory?","The checks that reliably identify a predatory journal, which warning signs no longer work on their own, and what to do if you have already submitted to one.",{"path":121,"heading":122,"description":123,"order":124},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","How do I respond to peer reviewer comments?","How to write a response to reviewers that gets a paper accepted, what to do when a reviewer is wrong, and how to structure the response letter itself.",3,{"path":126,"heading":127,"description":128,"order":67},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fwhy-papers-get-desk-rejected","Why was my paper desk rejected?","The real reasons editors reject papers without review, whether it is worth asking for reconsideration, and how to choose where to send the paper next.",{"path":130,"heading":131,"description":132,"order":133},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-peer-review-works","How does journal peer review actually work?","What actually happens to a manuscript after submission, how long peer review typically takes and why, and what the standard decision terms mean in practice.",5,{"path":135,"heading":136,"description":137,"order":138},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fjournal-submission-cover-letter","How do I write a cover letter for a journal submission?","What a journal submission cover letter should contain, what the editor is actually reading it for, and whether to suggest or exclude specific reviewers.",6,{"path":90,"heading":78,"description":73,"order":82},{"path":141,"heading":142,"description":143,"order":144},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-to-cite-a-preprint","How do I cite a preprint?","How to cite a preprint correctly, when citing unreviewed work is appropriate in a thesis or paper, and what to do when the preprint is later published.",8,{"path":146,"heading":147,"description":148,"order":149},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fdo-you-pay-to-publish-open-access","Do I have to pay to publish open access?","Whether open access publishing always costs money, what the green, gold, and diamond routes mean in practice, and what your options are with no funding.",9,{"path":151,"heading":152,"description":153,"order":154},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-author-order-is-decided","How is author order decided on a paper?","How authorship order is determined in different fields, what counts as enough contribution to be an author, and what to do when there is a dispute.",10,[156,159,162,165,168,171,174,177,180,183,186,189,192,195,198,201,204,207,210,213,216,219,222,225,228,231,234,237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264,267,270,273,276,279,282,285,288,291,294,297,300,303,306,309,312,315,318,321,323,324,325,326,327,328,329,330,331,332,333,336,339,342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369,372,375,378,381,384,387,390,392,395,398,401,404,407,410,413,416,419,422,425,428,431],{"path":157,"heading":158},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fdraft-without-stopping-for-citations","How do I draft when I keep stopping to look up citations?",{"path":160,"heading":161},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fhow-long-should-a-literature-review-chapter-be","How long should a literature review chapter be?",{"path":163,"heading":164},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fparaphrase-without-plagiarizing","How do I paraphrase a source without plagiarizing?",{"path":166,"heading":167},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fstructure-a-phd-thesis","How do I structure a PhD thesis chapter by chapter?",{"path":169,"heading":170},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fthesis-by-publication-or-monograph","Should I do a thesis by publication or a monograph?",{"path":172,"heading":173},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-discussion-section","How do I write a discussion section without repeating the results?",{"path":175,"heading":176},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-methodology-chapter","How do I write a methodology chapter?",{"path":178,"heading":179},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-thesis-introduction","How do I write a thesis introduction?",{"path":181,"heading":182},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-an-abstract","How do I write an abstract for a research paper?",{"path":184,"heading":185},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-consistently-during-a-phd","How do I write consistently during a PhD?",{"path":187,"heading":188},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fai-for-systematic-review-screening","Can I use AI for screening in a systematic review?",{"path":190,"heading":191},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fare-ai-detectors-reliable","Are AI detectors reliable?",{"path":193,"heading":194},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-an-ai-be-an-author","Can an AI tool be listed as an author on a paper?",{"path":196,"heading":197},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-i-use-ai-for-a-literature-review","Can I use AI for a literature review?",{"path":199,"heading":200},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","Can I trust AI summaries of research papers?",{"path":202,"heading":203},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fdisclose-ai-use-in-a-paper","Do I need to disclose AI use in a research paper?",{"path":205,"heading":206},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fhow-to-cite-chatgpt","How do I cite ChatGPT in APA 7?",{"path":208,"heading":209},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fis-using-chatgpt-plagiarism","Is using ChatGPT for academic writing plagiarism?",{"path":211,"heading":212},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-in-a-phd-thesis","Can I use AI in a PhD thesis?",{"path":214,"heading":215},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-to-write-a-peer-review","Can I use AI to help write a peer review?",{"path":217,"heading":218},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fverify-ai-generated-citations","How do I check whether AI-generated citations are real?",{"path":220,"heading":221},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-ai-answers-better-on-your-own-pdfs","Why does an AI answer better when it reads my own PDFs?",{"path":223,"heading":224},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-chatgpt-invents-references","Why does ChatGPT make up references?",{"path":226,"heading":227},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcheck-every-claim-against-its-citation","How do I check that every claim in my thesis is supported by its citation?",{"path":229,"heading":230},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcite-the-paper-you-read-or-the-original","Should I cite the paper I read or the original study it references?",{"path":232,"heading":233},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcited-source-does-not-say-that","What do I do when a paper's cited source does not support its claim?",{"path":235,"heading":236},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-paper-you-cannot-access","Can I cite a paper I cannot get hold of?",{"path":238,"heading":239},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","Is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice?",{"path":241,"heading":242},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fdo-i-need-to-cite-everything","Do I need to cite absolutely everything in a thesis?",{"path":244,"heading":245},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fhow-much-self-citation","How much self-citation is acceptable?",{"path":247,"heading":248},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fjournal-page-number-or-pdf-page-number","Do I use the journal page number or the PDF page number in a citation?",{"path":250,"heading":251},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fquoting-a-source-in-another-language","How do I quote a source in another language in an English thesis?",{"path":253,"heading":254},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fwhere-does-the-citation-go","Where should a citation go when only one clause in a sentence needs support?",{"path":256,"heading":257},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fyou-described-a-result-too-broadly","How do I fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly?",{"path":259,"heading":260},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fzotero-or-mendeley","Should I use Zotero or Mendeley for a PhD?",{"path":262,"heading":263},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fbuild-a-synthesis-matrix","How do I build a synthesis matrix when my themes keep changing as I read?",{"path":265,"heading":266},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fkeep-a-literature-review-current","How do I keep a literature review current over a multi-year PhD?",{"path":268,"heading":269},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-synthesis-or-summary","How do I know if my literature review is synthesis or just a summary?",{"path":271,"heading":272},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-too-descriptive","What does it mean when a supervisor says a literature review is too descriptive?",{"path":274,"heading":275},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review","What is the difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review?",{"path":277,"heading":278},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Forganize-literature-review-by-argument","How do I organize a literature review by argument instead of by paper?",{"path":280,"heading":281},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Freview-that-leads-to-your-question","How do I write a literature review that leads logically to my research question?",{"path":283,"heading":284},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fscreening-abstracts-for-a-review","How do I screen hundreds of abstracts for a systematic review?",{"path":286,"heading":287},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fstudies-with-opposite-conclusions","What do I write when two studies on the same question reach opposite conclusions?",{"path":289,"heading":290},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsynthesis-matrix-into-paragraphs","How do I turn a synthesis matrix into literature review paragraphs?",{"path":292,"heading":293},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsystematic-review-search-strategy","How do I build a search strategy for a systematic review?",{"path":295,"heading":296},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fwhen-to-stop-searching-for-papers","How do I know when to stop searching for papers for a literature review?",{"path":298,"heading":299},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fdefend-your-methodology-in-a-viva","How do I defend my methodology in a viva?",{"path":301,"heading":302},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fimposter-syndrome-in-a-phd","How do I deal with imposter syndrome during a PhD?",{"path":304,"heading":305},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fplan-a-realistic-phd-timeline","How do I plan a realistic PhD timeline?",{"path":307,"heading":308},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fpostdoc-or-industry","Should I do a postdoc or go to industry after my PhD?",{"path":310,"heading":311},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fprepare-for-a-phd-viva","How do I prepare for a PhD viva?",{"path":313,"heading":314},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fstop-procrastinating-on-your-phd","How do I stop procrastinating on my PhD?",{"path":316,"heading":317},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhat-happens-if-a-viva-goes-badly","What happens if you fail a PhD viva?",{"path":319,"heading":320},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhen-your-supervisor-is-not-supportive","What do I do when my PhD supervisor is not supportive?",{"path":94,"heading":322},"How do I write an academic CV for a postdoc application?",{"path":112,"heading":113},{"path":146,"heading":147},{"path":151,"heading":152},{"path":130,"heading":131},{"path":141,"heading":142},{"path":135,"heading":136},{"path":121,"heading":122},{"path":90,"heading":78},{"path":117,"heading":118},{"path":126,"heading":127},{"path":334,"heading":335},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ffind-the-paper-you-half-remember","How do I find a paper when I only remember the argument it made?",{"path":337,"heading":338},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhighlighting-pdfs-stops-working","Why can I never find my PDF highlights again?",{"path":340,"heading":341},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhow-many-papers-can-you-read-a-day","How many papers can a PhD student realistically read in a day?",{"path":343,"heading":344},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fkeep-up-with-new-papers","How do I keep up with new papers without reading everything?",{"path":346,"heading":347},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnon-english-studies-in-a-review","How do I include non-English studies in a literature review?",{"path":349,"heading":350},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnote-system-takes-too-long","What do I do when my note-taking system takes longer than reading the papers?",{"path":352,"heading":353},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Forganize-100-papers","How do I organize and extract information from more than 100 papers?",{"path":355,"heading":356},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Freading-papers-in-a-second-language","How do I read research papers efficiently when English is my second language?",{"path":358,"heading":359},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fremember-what-a-paper-said","How do I remember what was in papers I read months ago?",{"path":361,"heading":362},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Frestart-a-project-after-months-away","How do I get back into a research project after months away?",{"path":364,"heading":365},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftrack-connections-between-papers","How do I keep track of connections between papers?",{"path":367,"heading":368},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftriage-pdfs-before-reading","How do I triage 200 PDFs before deciding which ones to read in full?",{"path":370,"heading":371},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fanonymize-qualitative-data","How do I anonymize qualitative interview data?",{"path":373,"heading":374},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Ffair-data-principles-in-practice","What are the FAIR data principles?",{"path":376,"heading":377},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Forganize-research-data-files","How do I organize research data files?",{"path":379,"heading":380},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwhat-preregistration-is","What is preregistration in research?",{"path":382,"heading":383},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwrite-a-data-management-plan","How do I write a data management plan?",{"path":385,"heading":386},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fchoose-a-theoretical-framework","How do I choose a theoretical framework for my thesis?",{"path":388,"heading":389},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Ffind-a-research-gap","How do I identify a research gap in the literature?",{"path":95,"heading":391},"How do I know if my research gap is original?",{"path":393,"heading":394},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fnarrow-a-broad-research-question","How do I narrow down a research question that is too broad?",{"path":396,"heading":397},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-changed-mid-phd","Can a research question change during a PhD?",{"path":399,"heading":400},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-or-hypothesis","What is the difference between a research question and a hypothesis?",{"path":402,"heading":403},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fturn-a-topic-into-a-research-question","How do I turn a research topic into a research question?",{"path":405,"heading":406},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwhat-makes-a-good-research-question","What makes a good research question in a PhD thesis?",{"path":408,"heading":409},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwrite-a-research-gap-statement","How do I write a research gap statement?",{"path":411,"heading":412},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fchoose-a-statistical-test","How do I choose which statistical test to use?",{"path":414,"heading":415},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-many-interviews-is-enough","How many interviews are enough for a qualitative study?",{"path":417,"heading":418},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-to-do-thematic-analysis","How do I do thematic analysis step by step?",{"path":420,"heading":421},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Finductive-or-deductive-coding","What is the difference between inductive and deductive thematic analysis?",{"path":423,"heading":424},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fintegrate-mixed-methods-data","How do I integrate qualitative and quantitative data in a mixed methods study?",{"path":426,"heading":427},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Frigour-in-qualitative-research","How do I show rigour in qualitative research?",{"path":429,"heading":430},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwhat-a-p-value-means","What does a p value actually mean?",{"path":432,"heading":433},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwork-out-your-sample-size","How do I calculate the sample size for a study?",1786014769476]