[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":434},["ShallowReactive",2],{"answers-\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments":3,"answers-cluster-publishing":110,"answers-related-\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments":155},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"body":7,"cluster":72,"description":73,"extension":74,"faq":75,"heading":78,"intro":66,"kind":79,"meta":80,"navigation":81,"order":82,"outbound":83,"path":90,"primaryQuery":91,"product":92,"related":93,"seo":96,"sources":97,"stem":108,"updated":101,"__hash__":109},"answers\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments.md","How to Respond to Reviewer Comments","Answer every point, in order, quoting the comment and stating exactly what you changed and where. Make the editor's job easy. Most revisions fail not because the science was wrong but because the response letter left the editor unable to see whether the criticisms were addressed.",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":65},"minimark",[10,14,17,20,23,26,29,34,37,40,43,46,50,53,56,59,62],[11,12,13],"p",{},"Wait before you write anything. The first reading of a review is emotional and the letter you would write in that hour is not the letter you want to send. Two or three days later the same comments read as a list of tasks, and most of them turn out to be reasonable.",[11,15,16],{},"Write two documents, not one. Noble recommends an initial private document where you and your coauthors interpret the comments, compare possible responses, weigh the cost and benefit of extra experiments, and vent frustration, then a separate professional response written later, after some time has passed and after you have started addressing the critiques (Noble, 2017, pp. 3-4). The private draft is where the annoyance goes. The submitted letter is where the reasoning goes.",[11,18,19],{},"Then sort the comments. Some are straightforward fixes. Some ask for analysis you can do. Some ask for something impossible, such as data you cannot collect. Some rest on a misreading. Each category needs a different response, and doing this sorting before writing keeps the letter consistent in tone.",[11,21,22],{},"The letter's job is to let the editor decide quickly. That means quoting each comment, responding directly underneath it, and pointing to the exact place in the manuscript where the change appears. An editor who has to cross-reference three documents to check one point will take longer and be less inclined to accept.",[11,24,25],{},"Open with a summary of the major changes before you reach the point-by-point section, leading with new data or analyses that address the most important criticisms, and note where several reviewers raised the same issue. Then reproduce the complete reviews with your replies interleaved (Noble, 2017, p. 1). Inside that section, a three-part unit works: the reviewer comment, your response, and the change in the manuscript, with typography that keeps the three visually distinct (Noble, 2017, p. 2). Answer every point, minor comments included, rather than only the ones that are easy to answer, and make each reply self-contained so the reviewer does not have to hunt through the revised manuscript to see what you did (Noble, 2017, p. 2).",[11,27,28],{},"Thank the reviewers once, briefly, at the start. Extended gratitude in every response reads as anxiety. What actually persuades is evidence that you engaged with the substance.",[30,31,33],"h2",{"id":32},"what-do-i-do-with-a-reviewer-who-is-simply-wrong","What do I do with a reviewer who is simply wrong?",[11,35,36],{},"Disagree politely, give the reason, and treat the misunderstanding as evidence that your text was unclear. Then change something. A response that pushes back on every point without a single revision reads as defensive even when you are right on the substance.",[11,38,39],{},"The framing that works is that the reviewer read carefully and reached a conclusion your text permitted. Even when the reading was careless, writing it this way keeps the exchange productive and costs you nothing.",[11,41,42],{},"Noble's version of this is to accept that the presentation failed to communicate the point, revise the passage, and quote the revised wording directly in your response so the reviewer can see the fix without opening the manuscript (Noble, 2017, p. 2). That is not the same as conceding the point. It is worth knowing that reviewer judgements are less stable than the confident tone of a report suggests: Tennant and Ross-Hellauer report that studies of inter-reviewer reliability give variable results and that the research base on peer review is theoretically and empirically underdeveloped, with conflicting or inconclusive findings (Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, 2020, p. 1). They also note that reviewers usually cannot reproduce the submitted experiments and so have to trust your reported procedures, data, and analyses (Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, 2020, p. 7), and that impartiality can be affected by author nationality, institutional prestige, gender, discipline, confirmation bias, and workload, though much of that evidence comes from small journal-level datasets (Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, 2020, p. 4). Respond to every point, but separate a required correction from a preference.",[11,44,45],{},"Where a reviewer asks for something genuinely outside the scope of the paper, say so and explain the boundary. Editors are used to arbitrating this and will usually accept a clear, reasoned limit.",[30,47,49],{"id":48},"how-do-i-structure-the-response-letter","How do I structure the response letter?",[11,51,52],{},"A short covering paragraph, then each comment quoted in full, numbered, with your response immediately beneath it and the revised text quoted or the page number given. Reviewer by reviewer, in their order. Nothing clever, and nothing an editor has to search for.",[11,54,55],{},"Use formatting to separate comment from response, since a wall of undifferentiated text is hard to read. Bold or italic for the comment, plain for your reply, and the revised manuscript text indented.",[11,57,58],{},"Submit a tracked-changes version alongside a clean one unless the journal says otherwise. Editors and returning reviewers use it to check the revisions in minutes, and providing it makes acceptance faster.",[11,60,61],{},"When a reviewer's request contradicts an editor's instruction, hand the conflict to the editor instead of resolving it yourself. Noble's example is a reviewer asking you to move supplementary material into the main text while the editor has asked you to shorten the article, and the advice is to state the conflict and leave it to the editor's discretion (Noble, 2017, pp. 3-4). The same section asks you to identify and explain your changes relative to the previous version, which is what lets an editor verify the revision instead of taking your word for it (Noble, 2017, pp. 3-4).",[11,63,64],{},"Check the deadline and ask for an extension early if you need one. Most editors grant a few weeks without comment, and a late revision that arrives unannounced is treated as a new submission at some journals.",{"title":66,"searchDepth":67,"depth":67,"links":68},"",4,[69,71],{"id":32,"depth":70,"text":33},2,{"id":48,"depth":70,"text":49},"publishing","How to write a response to reviewers that gets a paper accepted, what to do when a reviewer is wrong, and how to structure the response letter itself.","md",[76,77],{"q":33,"a":36},{"q":49,"a":52},"How do I respond to peer reviewer comments?","answer",{},true,3,[84,87],{"label":85,"to":86},"AI verification of claims and citations","\u002Fdocs\u002Fcore-concepts\u002Fai-verification",{"label":88,"to":89},"Outlining a paper from a map","\u002Fdocs\u002Fresearch-workflows\u002Foutlining-a-paper","\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","how to respond to peer reviewer comments",null,[94,95],"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-discussion-section","\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-to-write-a-peer-review",{"title":5,"description":73},[98,102,105],{"label":99,"url":100,"checked":101},"Noble, Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers, PLoS Computational Biology (2017)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1005730","2026-08-06",{"label":103,"url":104,"checked":101},"Rahman and DeBlasio, Ten simple rules for writing a peer review, PLoS Computational Biology (2026)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1014359",{"label":106,"url":107,"checked":101},"Tennant and Ross-Hellauer, The limitations to our understanding of peer review, Research Integrity and Peer Review (2020)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1186\u002Fs41073-020-00092-1","answers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","ESdQn7KYaNPTzoDXy_E5cjy-i2DXogFQtT5OMMbBSTY",[111,116,120,121,125,130,135,140,145,150],{"path":112,"heading":113,"description":114,"order":115},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fchoose-a-journal","How do I choose a journal for my paper?","How to choose a journal that will actually consider your paper, whether impact factor matters at your career stage, and how to read a scope statement properly.",1,{"path":117,"heading":118,"description":119,"order":70},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fspot-a-predatory-journal","How do I tell if a journal is predatory?","The checks that reliably identify a predatory journal, which warning signs no longer work on their own, and what to do if you have already submitted to one.",{"path":90,"heading":78,"description":73,"order":82},{"path":122,"heading":123,"description":124,"order":67},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fwhy-papers-get-desk-rejected","Why was my paper desk rejected?","The real reasons editors reject papers without review, whether it is worth asking for reconsideration, and how to choose where to send the paper next.",{"path":126,"heading":127,"description":128,"order":129},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-peer-review-works","How does journal peer review actually work?","What actually happens to a manuscript after submission, how long peer review typically takes and why, and what the standard decision terms mean in practice.",5,{"path":131,"heading":132,"description":133,"order":134},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fjournal-submission-cover-letter","How do I write a cover letter for a journal submission?","What a journal submission cover letter should contain, what the editor is actually reading it for, and whether to suggest or exclude specific reviewers.",6,{"path":136,"heading":137,"description":138,"order":139},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","Should I post my paper as a preprint?","Whether to post your paper as a preprint before submission, whether journals will still accept it afterwards, and whether preprints count as publications.",7,{"path":141,"heading":142,"description":143,"order":144},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-to-cite-a-preprint","How do I cite a preprint?","How to cite a preprint correctly, when citing unreviewed work is appropriate in a thesis or paper, and what to do when the preprint is later published.",8,{"path":146,"heading":147,"description":148,"order":149},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fdo-you-pay-to-publish-open-access","Do I have to pay to publish open access?","Whether open access publishing always costs money, what the green, gold, and diamond routes mean in practice, and what your options are with no funding.",9,{"path":151,"heading":152,"description":153,"order":154},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-author-order-is-decided","How is author order decided on a paper?","How authorship order is determined in different fields, what counts as enough contribution to be an author, and what to do when there is a dispute.",10,[156,159,162,165,168,171,173,176,179,182,185,188,191,194,197,200,203,206,209,212,214,217,220,223,226,229,232,235,238,241,244,247,250,253,256,259,262,265,268,271,274,277,280,283,286,289,292,295,298,301,304,307,310,313,316,319,322,323,324,325,326,327,328,329,330,331,332,335,338,341,344,347,350,353,356,359,362,365,368,371,374,377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404,407,410,413,416,419,422,425,428,431],{"path":157,"heading":158},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fdraft-without-stopping-for-citations","How do I draft when I keep stopping to look up citations?",{"path":160,"heading":161},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fhow-long-should-a-literature-review-chapter-be","How long should a literature review chapter be?",{"path":163,"heading":164},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fparaphrase-without-plagiarizing","How do I paraphrase a source without plagiarizing?",{"path":166,"heading":167},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fstructure-a-phd-thesis","How do I structure a PhD thesis chapter by chapter?",{"path":169,"heading":170},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fthesis-by-publication-or-monograph","Should I do a thesis by publication or a monograph?",{"path":94,"heading":172},"How do I write a discussion section without repeating the results?",{"path":174,"heading":175},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-methodology-chapter","How do I write a methodology chapter?",{"path":177,"heading":178},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-thesis-introduction","How do I write a thesis introduction?",{"path":180,"heading":181},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-an-abstract","How do I write an abstract for a research paper?",{"path":183,"heading":184},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-consistently-during-a-phd","How do I write consistently during a PhD?",{"path":186,"heading":187},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fai-for-systematic-review-screening","Can I use AI for screening in a systematic review?",{"path":189,"heading":190},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fare-ai-detectors-reliable","Are AI detectors reliable?",{"path":192,"heading":193},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-an-ai-be-an-author","Can an AI tool be listed as an author on a paper?",{"path":195,"heading":196},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-i-use-ai-for-a-literature-review","Can I use AI for a literature review?",{"path":198,"heading":199},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","Can I trust AI summaries of research papers?",{"path":201,"heading":202},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fdisclose-ai-use-in-a-paper","Do I need to disclose AI use in a research paper?",{"path":204,"heading":205},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fhow-to-cite-chatgpt","How do I cite ChatGPT in APA 7?",{"path":207,"heading":208},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fis-using-chatgpt-plagiarism","Is using ChatGPT for academic writing plagiarism?",{"path":210,"heading":211},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-in-a-phd-thesis","Can I use AI in a PhD thesis?",{"path":95,"heading":213},"Can I use AI to help write a peer review?",{"path":215,"heading":216},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fverify-ai-generated-citations","How do I check whether AI-generated citations are real?",{"path":218,"heading":219},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-ai-answers-better-on-your-own-pdfs","Why does an AI answer better when it reads my own PDFs?",{"path":221,"heading":222},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-chatgpt-invents-references","Why does ChatGPT make up references?",{"path":224,"heading":225},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcheck-every-claim-against-its-citation","How do I check that every claim in my thesis is supported by its citation?",{"path":227,"heading":228},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcite-the-paper-you-read-or-the-original","Should I cite the paper I read or the original study it references?",{"path":230,"heading":231},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcited-source-does-not-say-that","What do I do when a paper's cited source does not support its claim?",{"path":233,"heading":234},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-paper-you-cannot-access","Can I cite a paper I cannot get hold of?",{"path":236,"heading":237},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","Is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice?",{"path":239,"heading":240},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fdo-i-need-to-cite-everything","Do I need to cite absolutely everything in a thesis?",{"path":242,"heading":243},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fhow-much-self-citation","How much self-citation is acceptable?",{"path":245,"heading":246},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fjournal-page-number-or-pdf-page-number","Do I use the journal page number or the PDF page number in a citation?",{"path":248,"heading":249},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fquoting-a-source-in-another-language","How do I quote a source in another language in an English thesis?",{"path":251,"heading":252},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fwhere-does-the-citation-go","Where should a citation go when only one clause in a sentence needs support?",{"path":254,"heading":255},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fyou-described-a-result-too-broadly","How do I fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly?",{"path":257,"heading":258},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fzotero-or-mendeley","Should I use Zotero or Mendeley for a PhD?",{"path":260,"heading":261},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fbuild-a-synthesis-matrix","How do I build a synthesis matrix when my themes keep changing as I read?",{"path":263,"heading":264},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fkeep-a-literature-review-current","How do I keep a literature review current over a multi-year PhD?",{"path":266,"heading":267},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-synthesis-or-summary","How do I know if my literature review is synthesis or just a summary?",{"path":269,"heading":270},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-too-descriptive","What does it mean when a supervisor says a literature review is too descriptive?",{"path":272,"heading":273},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review","What is the difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review?",{"path":275,"heading":276},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Forganize-literature-review-by-argument","How do I organize a literature review by argument instead of by paper?",{"path":278,"heading":279},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Freview-that-leads-to-your-question","How do I write a literature review that leads logically to my research question?",{"path":281,"heading":282},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fscreening-abstracts-for-a-review","How do I screen hundreds of abstracts for a systematic review?",{"path":284,"heading":285},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fstudies-with-opposite-conclusions","What do I write when two studies on the same question reach opposite conclusions?",{"path":287,"heading":288},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsynthesis-matrix-into-paragraphs","How do I turn a synthesis matrix into literature review paragraphs?",{"path":290,"heading":291},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsystematic-review-search-strategy","How do I build a search strategy for a systematic review?",{"path":293,"heading":294},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fwhen-to-stop-searching-for-papers","How do I know when to stop searching for papers for a literature review?",{"path":296,"heading":297},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fdefend-your-methodology-in-a-viva","How do I defend my methodology in a viva?",{"path":299,"heading":300},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fimposter-syndrome-in-a-phd","How do I deal with imposter syndrome during a PhD?",{"path":302,"heading":303},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fplan-a-realistic-phd-timeline","How do I plan a realistic PhD timeline?",{"path":305,"heading":306},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fpostdoc-or-industry","Should I do a postdoc or go to industry after my PhD?",{"path":308,"heading":309},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fprepare-for-a-phd-viva","How do I prepare for a PhD viva?",{"path":311,"heading":312},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fstop-procrastinating-on-your-phd","How do I stop procrastinating on my PhD?",{"path":314,"heading":315},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhat-happens-if-a-viva-goes-badly","What happens if you fail a PhD viva?",{"path":317,"heading":318},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhen-your-supervisor-is-not-supportive","What do I do when my PhD supervisor is not supportive?",{"path":320,"heading":321},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwrite-an-academic-cv","How do I write an academic CV for a postdoc application?",{"path":112,"heading":113},{"path":146,"heading":147},{"path":151,"heading":152},{"path":126,"heading":127},{"path":141,"heading":142},{"path":131,"heading":132},{"path":90,"heading":78},{"path":136,"heading":137},{"path":117,"heading":118},{"path":122,"heading":123},{"path":333,"heading":334},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ffind-the-paper-you-half-remember","How do I find a paper when I only remember the argument it made?",{"path":336,"heading":337},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhighlighting-pdfs-stops-working","Why can I never find my PDF highlights again?",{"path":339,"heading":340},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhow-many-papers-can-you-read-a-day","How many papers can a PhD student realistically read in a day?",{"path":342,"heading":343},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fkeep-up-with-new-papers","How do I keep up with new papers without reading everything?",{"path":345,"heading":346},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnon-english-studies-in-a-review","How do I include non-English studies in a literature review?",{"path":348,"heading":349},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnote-system-takes-too-long","What do I do when my note-taking system takes longer than reading the papers?",{"path":351,"heading":352},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Forganize-100-papers","How do I organize and extract information from more than 100 papers?",{"path":354,"heading":355},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Freading-papers-in-a-second-language","How do I read research papers efficiently when English is my second language?",{"path":357,"heading":358},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fremember-what-a-paper-said","How do I remember what was in papers I read months ago?",{"path":360,"heading":361},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Frestart-a-project-after-months-away","How do I get back into a research project after months away?",{"path":363,"heading":364},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftrack-connections-between-papers","How do I keep track of connections between papers?",{"path":366,"heading":367},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftriage-pdfs-before-reading","How do I triage 200 PDFs before deciding which ones to read in full?",{"path":369,"heading":370},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fanonymize-qualitative-data","How do I anonymize qualitative interview data?",{"path":372,"heading":373},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Ffair-data-principles-in-practice","What are the FAIR data principles?",{"path":375,"heading":376},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Forganize-research-data-files","How do I organize research data files?",{"path":378,"heading":379},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwhat-preregistration-is","What is preregistration in research?",{"path":381,"heading":382},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwrite-a-data-management-plan","How do I write a data management plan?",{"path":384,"heading":385},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fchoose-a-theoretical-framework","How do I choose a theoretical framework for my thesis?",{"path":387,"heading":388},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Ffind-a-research-gap","How do I identify a research gap in the literature?",{"path":390,"heading":391},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original","How do I know if my research gap is original?",{"path":393,"heading":394},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fnarrow-a-broad-research-question","How do I narrow down a research question that is too broad?",{"path":396,"heading":397},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-changed-mid-phd","Can a research question change during a PhD?",{"path":399,"heading":400},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-or-hypothesis","What is the difference between a research question and a hypothesis?",{"path":402,"heading":403},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fturn-a-topic-into-a-research-question","How do I turn a research topic into a research question?",{"path":405,"heading":406},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwhat-makes-a-good-research-question","What makes a good research question in a PhD thesis?",{"path":408,"heading":409},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwrite-a-research-gap-statement","How do I write a research gap statement?",{"path":411,"heading":412},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fchoose-a-statistical-test","How do I choose which statistical test to use?",{"path":414,"heading":415},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-many-interviews-is-enough","How many interviews are enough for a qualitative study?",{"path":417,"heading":418},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-to-do-thematic-analysis","How do I do thematic analysis step by step?",{"path":420,"heading":421},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Finductive-or-deductive-coding","What is the difference between inductive and deductive thematic analysis?",{"path":423,"heading":424},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fintegrate-mixed-methods-data","How do I integrate qualitative and quantitative data in a mixed methods study?",{"path":426,"heading":427},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Frigour-in-qualitative-research","How do I show rigour in qualitative research?",{"path":429,"heading":430},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwhat-a-p-value-means","What does a p value actually mean?",{"path":432,"heading":433},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwork-out-your-sample-size","How do I calculate the sample size for a study?",1786014769452]