[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":434},["ShallowReactive",2],{"answers-\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review":3,"answers-cluster-literature-review":104,"answers-related-\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review":159},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"body":7,"cluster":66,"description":67,"extension":68,"faq":69,"heading":72,"intro":60,"kind":73,"meta":74,"navigation":75,"order":76,"outbound":77,"path":84,"primaryQuery":85,"product":86,"related":87,"seo":90,"sources":91,"stem":102,"updated":95,"__hash__":103},"answers\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review.md","Narrative, Scoping, or Systematic Review: Which One?","A systematic review answers one narrow question with a search protocol specified in advance and reported in full, so another researcher could repeat it. A narrative review builds an argument about a field, selecting sources by judgment. The difference is reproducibility of selection, not thoroughness or quality.",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":59},"minimark",[10,14,17,20,23,26,29,34,37,40,43,47,50,53,56],[11,12,13],"p",{},"The distinction is often taught as a hierarchy, with systematic reviews at the top and narrative reviews as the thing you do when you cannot manage a real one. That is misleading. They answer different kinds of question and are not substitutes.",[11,15,16],{},"A systematic review works when the question is narrow enough to be specified precisely: does this intervention change this outcome in this population. The protocol is fixed before searching, the search is exhaustive within stated bounds, screening is done against explicit criteria and usually by two people, and everything is reported so the process could be repeated. The strength is that the selection of evidence is not a matter of your judgment.",[11,18,19],{},"Munn and colleagues set the two apart as a list of dimensions rather than a matter of degree. Their comparison marks the traditional literature review as having no a priori protocol, no PROSPERO registration, no peer-reviewed search strategy, no standardized extraction form, no mandatory risk-of-bias assessment, and no synthesis into summary findings, while the systematic review is marked yes on every one of them (Munn et al., 2018, p. 6). If you cannot answer yes to those six, you have written a narrative review, whatever the chapter is titled.",[11,21,22],{},"A narrative review works when the question is about a field rather than an effect: how has this concept been theorized, what assumptions do these traditions share, where is the argument stuck. That work requires judgment about relevance and cannot be reduced to inclusion criteria. Applying a systematic protocol to it would not make it more rigorous, only more expensive.",[11,24,25],{},"The same authors are direct about what that judgment costs you. A review resting on the author's prior knowledge and experience is, in their assessment, subjective and not unbiased, exhaustive, or systematic, though it can still give a useful overview of a field (Munn et al., 2018, p. 5). Pautasso qualifies the split differently. Review formats sit on continua rather than in fixed categories, and the form you choose should follow the material, the target journal, the time available, and the number of coauthors (Pautasso, 2013, pp. 2-3). Note also that pooling results statistically is a meta-analysis, which can sit inside a systematic review but is not another name for one.",[11,27,28],{},"Most doctoral literature review chapters are narrative, and that is appropriate. The chapter's job is to establish that your research question is worth answering, which is an argument, not a pooled estimate. What a narrative chapter still owes the reader is honesty about how the sources were found, so nobody has to guess whether the coverage is representative or convenient.",[30,31,33],"h2",{"id":32},"when-does-a-scoping-review-make-more-sense-than-either","When does a scoping review make more sense than either?",[11,35,36],{},"When you want to map what exists rather than answer a question. Scoping reviews suit fields where the literature is scattered across disciplines or the concepts are still unsettled, and they report the shape and volume of the evidence rather than pooling a result from it.",[11,38,39],{},"They are also the right choice when you suspect a systematic review would be premature. If the primary studies use incompatible measures or definitions, pooling them produces a number that means nothing, and saying so with a scoping review is the more useful contribution.",[11,41,42],{},"Scoping reviews follow a protocol and are reported against a checklist, so they are not a softer option. They are a different question with comparable discipline.",[30,44,46],{"id":45},"do-i-need-prisma-for-a-thesis-chapter","Do I need PRISMA for a thesis chapter?",[11,48,49],{},"Only if you are presenting the chapter as a systematic or scoping review. PRISMA is a reporting standard for those designs, and its 2020 statement and flow diagram apply there. For a narrative chapter, describing your search honestly is enough and a flow diagram would misrepresent the method.",[11,51,52],{},"Some supervisors ask for a flow diagram in a narrative chapter because it looks rigorous. It is worth pushing back gently. A diagram reporting records identified, screened, and excluded implies a protocol-driven process, and presenting a judgment-based selection in that format overstates what you did.",[11,54,55],{},"The checklist shows how much reporting the design actually carries. PRISMA 2020 replaced the 2009 statement with 27 items across seven sections, plus item-by-item guidance, a separate abstract checklist, and revised flow diagrams (Page et al., 2021, pp. 1-2). Those items ask for a risk-of-bias assessment for every included study, study-level statistics with their precision, the synthesis results, heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses, the certainty of the evidence, protocol and registration details, competing interests, and where your extracted data and analytic code can be found (Page et al., 2021, p. 8). Almost none of that applies to a chapter whose sources were chosen by judgment, which is the concrete reason a flow diagram misreports a narrative review.",[11,57,58],{},"What you can do instead is a short methods paragraph: the databases, the terms, the date range, the date of the last search, and the criteria you applied. That gives the reader the same information without claiming a design you did not use.",{"title":60,"searchDepth":61,"depth":61,"links":62},"",4,[63,65],{"id":32,"depth":64,"text":33},2,{"id":45,"depth":64,"text":46},"literature-review","The real difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review, when a scoping review fits better, and whether a thesis chapter needs PRISMA.","md",[70,71],{"q":33,"a":36},{"q":46,"a":49},"What is the difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review?","answer",{},true,9,[78,81],{"label":79,"to":80},"The literature review workflow","\u002Fdocs\u002Fresearch-workflows\u002Fliterature-review",{"label":82,"to":83},"Corpus filters and reproducible retrieval","\u002Fdocs\u002Fcore-concepts\u002Frag-and-retrieval","\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review","difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review",null,[88,89],"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-to-do-thematic-analysis","\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-methodology-chapter",{"title":5,"description":67},[92,96,99],{"label":93,"url":94,"checked":95},"Page et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, BMJ (2021)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1136\u002Fbmj.n71","2026-08-06",{"label":97,"url":98,"checked":95},"Munn et al., Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach, BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1186\u002Fs12874-018-0611-x",{"label":100,"url":101,"checked":95},"Pautasso, Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review, PLoS Computational Biology (2013)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1003149","answers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review","mpCg1cg4pIF1XwNIhfTVOIldq6tqmiY3FncBuEbqwhk",[105,110,114,119,123,128,133,138,143,144,149,154],{"path":106,"heading":107,"description":108,"order":109},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-synthesis-or-summary","How do I know if my literature review is synthesis or just a summary?","How to tell a summarizing literature review from a synthesizing one, what a synthesis paragraph actually looks like, and how to rebuild a chapter that lists authors.",1,{"path":111,"heading":112,"description":113,"order":64},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fstudies-with-opposite-conclusions","What do I write when two studies on the same question reach opposite conclusions?","What to write when the evidence contradicts itself, whether the disagreement belongs in the review or the discussion, and how to analyze it without picking a winner.",{"path":115,"heading":116,"description":117,"order":118},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Forganize-literature-review-by-argument","How do I organize a literature review by argument instead of by paper?","How to structure a review chapter around claims instead of sources, how to find the themes when every paper looks different, and whether to order it thematically.",3,{"path":120,"heading":121,"description":122,"order":61},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fwhen-to-stop-searching-for-papers","How do I know when to stop searching for papers for a literature review?","How to know your literature search is finished, how many papers a review actually needs, and what stopping rule you can defend in a methods section.",{"path":124,"heading":125,"description":126,"order":127},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fbuild-a-synthesis-matrix","How do I build a synthesis matrix when my themes keep changing as I read?","How to build a literature synthesis matrix when your themes keep changing, which way round the rows and columns go, and how much to write in each cell.",5,{"path":129,"heading":130,"description":131,"order":132},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsynthesis-matrix-into-paragraphs","How do I turn a synthesis matrix into literature review paragraphs?","How to get from a completed synthesis matrix to written literature review paragraphs, the shape of a good synthesis paragraph, and how many sources belong in one.",6,{"path":134,"heading":135,"description":136,"order":137},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-too-descriptive","What does it mean when a supervisor says a literature review is too descriptive?","What supervisors mean when they call a literature review too descriptive, how to add critique without inserting opinion, and which sentences signal analysis.",7,{"path":139,"heading":140,"description":141,"order":142},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fkeep-a-literature-review-current","How do I keep a literature review current over a multi-year PhD?","How to stop a review chapter going stale across a long PhD, how often to rerun searches, and how to update the chapter before submission without rewriting it.",8,{"path":84,"heading":72,"description":67,"order":76},{"path":145,"heading":146,"description":147,"order":148},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsystematic-review-search-strategy","How do I build a search strategy for a systematic review?","How to build a systematic review search strategy, how to decide which databases to search, and how to document a search so another researcher could repeat it.",10,{"path":150,"heading":151,"description":152,"order":153},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fscreening-abstracts-for-a-review","How do I screen hundreds of abstracts for a systematic review?","How to screen hundreds of abstracts for a review, what makes an inclusion criterion usable, and what to do when two screeners disagree about a paper.",11,{"path":155,"heading":156,"description":157,"order":158},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Freview-that-leads-to-your-question","How do I write a literature review that leads logically to my research question?","How to write a literature review that arrives at your research question, how to show a gap without dismissing other people's work, and where the gap statement goes.",12,[160,163,166,169,172,175,178,180,183,186,189,192,195,198,201,204,207,210,213,216,219,222,225,228,231,234,237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,279,282,285,288,291,294,297,300,303,306,309,312,315,318,321,324,327,330,333,336,339,342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369,372,375,378,381,384,387,390,393,396,399,402,405,408,411,414,417,419,422,425,428,431],{"path":161,"heading":162},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fdraft-without-stopping-for-citations","How do I draft when I keep stopping to look up citations?",{"path":164,"heading":165},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fhow-long-should-a-literature-review-chapter-be","How long should a literature review chapter be?",{"path":167,"heading":168},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fparaphrase-without-plagiarizing","How do I paraphrase a source without plagiarizing?",{"path":170,"heading":171},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fstructure-a-phd-thesis","How do I structure a PhD thesis chapter by chapter?",{"path":173,"heading":174},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fthesis-by-publication-or-monograph","Should I do a thesis by publication or a monograph?",{"path":176,"heading":177},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-discussion-section","How do I write a discussion section without repeating the results?",{"path":89,"heading":179},"How do I write a methodology chapter?",{"path":181,"heading":182},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-thesis-introduction","How do I write a thesis introduction?",{"path":184,"heading":185},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-an-abstract","How do I write an abstract for a research paper?",{"path":187,"heading":188},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-consistently-during-a-phd","How do I write consistently during a PhD?",{"path":190,"heading":191},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fai-for-systematic-review-screening","Can I use AI for screening in a systematic review?",{"path":193,"heading":194},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fare-ai-detectors-reliable","Are AI detectors reliable?",{"path":196,"heading":197},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-an-ai-be-an-author","Can an AI tool be listed as an author on a paper?",{"path":199,"heading":200},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-i-use-ai-for-a-literature-review","Can I use AI for a literature review?",{"path":202,"heading":203},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","Can I trust AI summaries of research papers?",{"path":205,"heading":206},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fdisclose-ai-use-in-a-paper","Do I need to disclose AI use in a research paper?",{"path":208,"heading":209},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fhow-to-cite-chatgpt","How do I cite ChatGPT in APA 7?",{"path":211,"heading":212},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fis-using-chatgpt-plagiarism","Is using ChatGPT for academic writing plagiarism?",{"path":214,"heading":215},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-in-a-phd-thesis","Can I use AI in a PhD thesis?",{"path":217,"heading":218},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-to-write-a-peer-review","Can I use AI to help write a peer review?",{"path":220,"heading":221},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fverify-ai-generated-citations","How do I check whether AI-generated citations are real?",{"path":223,"heading":224},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-ai-answers-better-on-your-own-pdfs","Why does an AI answer better when it reads my own PDFs?",{"path":226,"heading":227},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-chatgpt-invents-references","Why does ChatGPT make up references?",{"path":229,"heading":230},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcheck-every-claim-against-its-citation","How do I check that every claim in my thesis is supported by its citation?",{"path":232,"heading":233},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcite-the-paper-you-read-or-the-original","Should I cite the paper I read or the original study it references?",{"path":235,"heading":236},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcited-source-does-not-say-that","What do I do when a paper's cited source does not support its claim?",{"path":238,"heading":239},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-paper-you-cannot-access","Can I cite a paper I cannot get hold of?",{"path":241,"heading":242},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","Is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice?",{"path":244,"heading":245},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fdo-i-need-to-cite-everything","Do I need to cite absolutely everything in a thesis?",{"path":247,"heading":248},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fhow-much-self-citation","How much self-citation is acceptable?",{"path":250,"heading":251},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fjournal-page-number-or-pdf-page-number","Do I use the journal page number or the PDF page number in a citation?",{"path":253,"heading":254},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fquoting-a-source-in-another-language","How do I quote a source in another language in an English thesis?",{"path":256,"heading":257},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fwhere-does-the-citation-go","Where should a citation go when only one clause in a sentence needs support?",{"path":259,"heading":260},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fyou-described-a-result-too-broadly","How do I fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly?",{"path":262,"heading":263},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fzotero-or-mendeley","Should I use Zotero or Mendeley for a PhD?",{"path":124,"heading":125},{"path":139,"heading":140},{"path":106,"heading":107},{"path":134,"heading":135},{"path":84,"heading":72},{"path":115,"heading":116},{"path":155,"heading":156},{"path":150,"heading":151},{"path":111,"heading":112},{"path":129,"heading":130},{"path":145,"heading":146},{"path":120,"heading":121},{"path":277,"heading":278},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fdefend-your-methodology-in-a-viva","How do I defend my methodology in a viva?",{"path":280,"heading":281},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fimposter-syndrome-in-a-phd","How do I deal with imposter syndrome during a PhD?",{"path":283,"heading":284},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fplan-a-realistic-phd-timeline","How do I plan a realistic PhD timeline?",{"path":286,"heading":287},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fpostdoc-or-industry","Should I do a postdoc or go to industry after my PhD?",{"path":289,"heading":290},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fprepare-for-a-phd-viva","How do I prepare for a PhD viva?",{"path":292,"heading":293},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fstop-procrastinating-on-your-phd","How do I stop procrastinating on my PhD?",{"path":295,"heading":296},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhat-happens-if-a-viva-goes-badly","What happens if you fail a PhD viva?",{"path":298,"heading":299},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhen-your-supervisor-is-not-supportive","What do I do when my PhD supervisor is not supportive?",{"path":301,"heading":302},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwrite-an-academic-cv","How do I write an academic CV for a postdoc application?",{"path":304,"heading":305},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fchoose-a-journal","How do I choose a journal for my paper?",{"path":307,"heading":308},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fdo-you-pay-to-publish-open-access","Do I have to pay to publish open access?",{"path":310,"heading":311},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-author-order-is-decided","How is author order decided on a paper?",{"path":313,"heading":314},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-peer-review-works","How does journal peer review actually work?",{"path":316,"heading":317},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-to-cite-a-preprint","How do I cite a preprint?",{"path":319,"heading":320},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fjournal-submission-cover-letter","How do I write a cover letter for a journal submission?",{"path":322,"heading":323},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","How do I respond to peer reviewer comments?",{"path":325,"heading":326},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","Should I post my paper as a preprint?",{"path":328,"heading":329},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fspot-a-predatory-journal","How do I tell if a journal is predatory?",{"path":331,"heading":332},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fwhy-papers-get-desk-rejected","Why was my paper desk rejected?",{"path":334,"heading":335},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ffind-the-paper-you-half-remember","How do I find a paper when I only remember the argument it made?",{"path":337,"heading":338},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhighlighting-pdfs-stops-working","Why can I never find my PDF highlights again?",{"path":340,"heading":341},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhow-many-papers-can-you-read-a-day","How many papers can a PhD student realistically read in a day?",{"path":343,"heading":344},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fkeep-up-with-new-papers","How do I keep up with new papers without reading everything?",{"path":346,"heading":347},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnon-english-studies-in-a-review","How do I include non-English studies in a literature review?",{"path":349,"heading":350},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnote-system-takes-too-long","What do I do when my note-taking system takes longer than reading the papers?",{"path":352,"heading":353},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Forganize-100-papers","How do I organize and extract information from more than 100 papers?",{"path":355,"heading":356},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Freading-papers-in-a-second-language","How do I read research papers efficiently when English is my second language?",{"path":358,"heading":359},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fremember-what-a-paper-said","How do I remember what was in papers I read months ago?",{"path":361,"heading":362},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Frestart-a-project-after-months-away","How do I get back into a research project after months away?",{"path":364,"heading":365},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftrack-connections-between-papers","How do I keep track of connections between papers?",{"path":367,"heading":368},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftriage-pdfs-before-reading","How do I triage 200 PDFs before deciding which ones to read in full?",{"path":370,"heading":371},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fanonymize-qualitative-data","How do I anonymize qualitative interview data?",{"path":373,"heading":374},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Ffair-data-principles-in-practice","What are the FAIR data principles?",{"path":376,"heading":377},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Forganize-research-data-files","How do I organize research data files?",{"path":379,"heading":380},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwhat-preregistration-is","What is preregistration in research?",{"path":382,"heading":383},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwrite-a-data-management-plan","How do I write a data management plan?",{"path":385,"heading":386},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fchoose-a-theoretical-framework","How do I choose a theoretical framework for my thesis?",{"path":388,"heading":389},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Ffind-a-research-gap","How do I identify a research gap in the literature?",{"path":391,"heading":392},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original","How do I know if my research gap is original?",{"path":394,"heading":395},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fnarrow-a-broad-research-question","How do I narrow down a research question that is too broad?",{"path":397,"heading":398},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-changed-mid-phd","Can a research question change during a PhD?",{"path":400,"heading":401},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-or-hypothesis","What is the difference between a research question and a hypothesis?",{"path":403,"heading":404},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fturn-a-topic-into-a-research-question","How do I turn a research topic into a research question?",{"path":406,"heading":407},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwhat-makes-a-good-research-question","What makes a good research question in a PhD thesis?",{"path":409,"heading":410},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwrite-a-research-gap-statement","How do I write a research gap statement?",{"path":412,"heading":413},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fchoose-a-statistical-test","How do I choose which statistical test to use?",{"path":415,"heading":416},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-many-interviews-is-enough","How many interviews are enough for a qualitative study?",{"path":88,"heading":418},"How do I do thematic analysis step by step?",{"path":420,"heading":421},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Finductive-or-deductive-coding","What is the difference between inductive and deductive thematic analysis?",{"path":423,"heading":424},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fintegrate-mixed-methods-data","How do I integrate qualitative and quantitative data in a mixed methods study?",{"path":426,"heading":427},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Frigour-in-qualitative-research","How do I show rigour in qualitative research?",{"path":429,"heading":430},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwhat-a-p-value-means","What does a p value actually mean?",{"path":432,"heading":433},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwork-out-your-sample-size","How do I calculate the sample size for a study?",1786014767668]