[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":437},["ShallowReactive",2],{"answers-\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original":3,"answers-cluster-citations":106,"answers-related-\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original":161},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"body":7,"cluster":69,"description":70,"extension":71,"faq":72,"heading":75,"intro":63,"kind":76,"meta":77,"navigation":78,"order":79,"outbound":80,"path":87,"primaryQuery":88,"product":89,"related":90,"seo":92,"sources":93,"stem":104,"updated":97,"__hash__":105},"answers\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original.md","Is Citing a Review Instead of the Original Bad Practice?","It depends on what the citation is for. Citing a review for a broad statement about a field is correct and efficient. Citing a review for a specific finding, when you mean the study that produced it, misattributes the work and hides that you did not check the primary source.",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":62},"minimark",[10,14,17,20,23,26,29,32,37,40,43,46,49,53,56,59],[11,12,13],"p",{},"The question comes up because citing reviews is efficient and everyone does it, while the rule as usually stated makes it sound like a shortcut. The rule as usually stated is too blunt. What matters is whether the review is the appropriate source for the specific claim you are making.",[11,15,16],{},"Think about what a reader would do with the citation. If they follow it, do they land on something that supports your sentence? For \"the effect has been replicated in three national samples\", a review that surveys those samples is exactly the right destination. For \"mentoring raised retention by eleven points\", the reader needs the study that measured eleven points, and sending them to a review that mentions it is unhelpful and mildly misleading.",[11,18,19],{},"One workable split is by section. Penders recommends prioritizing reviews in introductions, where broad context is what the reader needs, and empirical papers in discussions, where the detailed contribution of each study is doing the work (Penders, 2018, p. 4). The same rules ask that a citation identify the exact contribution of the source rather than only place it in the bibliography (Penders, 2018, p. 2).",[11,21,22],{},"There is a second consideration about credit. Attributing a specific empirical finding to a review means the people who did the work do not get cited for it. Over a literature this has real effects on how contributions are recorded, and it is one of the reasons the practice is discouraged even when the claim is accurate.",[11,24,25],{},"There is also a risk in what the secondary source leaves out. Greenberg mapped a citation network around beta-amyloid claims in inclusion body myositis and found the selection was extreme. Of 32 citations to primary data on whether animal and cell-culture experiments were valid models, 31, or 97%, went to four highly supportive papers, and one, or 3%, went to six papers that weakened or rejected those models (Greenberg, 2009, p. 3). Eight key papers, seven of them from a single research group, carried 97% of the network's citation traffic (Greenberg, 2009, p. 5). A source that repeats the dominant interpretation without reporting the disagreement will show you a settled picture the primary literature does not support.",[11,27,28],{},"The same analysis shows how the distortion happens sentence by sentence. One primary paper found no beta-amyloid precursor protein or beta-amyloid in three of five patients and found it in only a few fibres in the other two, yet three later papers described those data as confirming a broader accumulation claim, and the resulting diversion generated 7,848 supportive citation paths (Greenberg, 2009, p. 3). Greenberg also describes citation transmutation, where a hypothesis was presented as established fact through citations to papers that stated only the hypothesis or did not address it at all (Greenberg, 2009, p. 6). Reading the original is what catches this.",[11,30,31],{},"The middle option is to cite both, and it is often the right one. \"(Fenton, 2019, reviewed in Alvarez, 2022)\" credits the study, points the reader at the wider context, and tells the truth about how you found it.",[33,34,36],"h2",{"id":35},"when-is-citing-a-review-the-right-call","When is citing a review the right call?",[11,38,39],{},"When your claim is about the state of the literature rather than about a particular result. \"The relationship has been examined across a range of settings\" is a claim a review supports better than any single study. Reviews are also correct when you are citing the reviewer's own synthesis or argument.",[11,41,42],{},"Systematic reviews and meta-analyses deserve a note of their own. A pooled effect estimate is a result the review produced, not a summary of someone else's, so citing it to the review is correct and citing it to the included studies would be wrong.",[11,44,45],{},"That does not make the pooled estimate self-sufficient. Carlson and colleagues advise checking whether the review searched at least three bibliographic databases, looked beyond databases through methods such as hand searching, and included relevant unpublished studies (Carlson et al., 2023, p. 2). They also note that readers may need to inspect key included studies individually to judge the limitations and bias the pooled result inherits, including problems with missing data (Carlson et al., 2023, p. 3). If you rely on a meta-analysis for a load-bearing claim, that inspection is part of the citation, not an optional extra.",[11,47,48],{},"Reviews are also the right citation when you are explicitly signposting further reading. \"For a fuller treatment, see\" is a legitimate use and reads as generous rather than lazy.",[33,50,52],{"id":51},"how-many-citations-does-a-broad-claim-need","How many citations does a broad claim need?",[11,54,55],{},"One good review, or two to four representative primary studies chosen to show the range rather than to prove volume. Stacking eight citations on an uncontroversial claim does not strengthen it. If the claim is contested, cite both sides rather than more of one.",[11,57,58],{},"Choosing representatives is a judgment worth making deliberately. Pick studies that differ in design, population, or era, so the citation group demonstrates that the finding is not an artifact of one approach. Three well-chosen citations do more work than eight from the same laboratory.",[11,60,61],{},"Where you have room, one sentence saying why those studies were chosen turns a citation list into an argument. \"Established across observational and experimental designs\" tells the reader something the parentheses cannot.",{"title":63,"searchDepth":64,"depth":64,"links":65},"",4,[66,68],{"id":35,"depth":67,"text":36},2,{"id":51,"depth":67,"text":52},"citations","Whether citing a review article instead of the primary studies is acceptable, when a review is the right citation, and how many sources a broad claim needs.","md",[73,74],{"q":36,"a":39},{"q":52,"a":55},"Is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice?","answer",{},true,5,[81,84],{"label":82,"to":83},"Building a qualitative evidence matrix","\u002Fblog\u002Fqualitative-evidence-matrix",{"label":85,"to":86},"The literature review workflow","\u002Fdocs\u002Fresearch-workflows\u002Fliterature-review","\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice",null,[91],"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review",{"title":5,"description":70},[94,98,101],{"label":95,"url":96,"checked":97},"Greenberg, How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network, BMJ (2009)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1136\u002Fbmj.b2680","2026-08-06",{"label":99,"url":100,"checked":97},"Carlson et al., Ten simple rules for interpreting and evaluating a meta-analysis, PLoS Computational Biology (2023)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1011461",{"label":102,"url":103,"checked":97},"Penders, Ten simple rules for responsible referencing, PLoS Computational Biology (2018)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1006036","answers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","ebc70QJJf1QcezbsjYbau5OFgcyO020ojEzlvuL8B0g",[107,112,116,121,125,126,131,136,141,146,151,156],{"path":108,"heading":109,"description":110,"order":111},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fdo-i-need-to-cite-everything","Do I need to cite absolutely everything in a thesis?","Whether every sentence in a thesis needs a citation, what counts as common knowledge in your field, and whether it is possible to cite too much.",1,{"path":113,"heading":114,"description":115,"order":67},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fwhere-does-the-citation-go","Where should a citation go when only one clause in a sentence needs support?","Where the citation marker belongs when only part of a sentence comes from a source, whether to repeat it every sentence, and how to attribute a paragraph.",{"path":117,"heading":118,"description":119,"order":120},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcite-the-paper-you-read-or-the-original","Should I cite the paper I read or the original study it references?","Whether to cite the paper you actually read or the original study it references, when an as cited in citation is acceptable, and what goes in the reference list.",3,{"path":122,"heading":123,"description":124,"order":64},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-paper-you-cannot-access","Can I cite a paper I cannot get hold of?","What to do about a paywalled or unavailable paper you need to cite, the legitimate ways to get a copy, and how to cite it if you genuinely cannot read it.",{"path":87,"heading":75,"description":70,"order":79},{"path":127,"heading":128,"description":129,"order":130},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcited-source-does-not-say-that","What do I do when a paper's cited source does not support its claim?","What to do when a paper's citation does not support the claim attached to it, how far back through a citation chain to check, and whether you can use the claim.",6,{"path":132,"heading":133,"description":134,"order":135},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcheck-every-claim-against-its-citation","How do I check that every claim in my thesis is supported by its citation?","How to verify that every claim in a thesis is supported by its source, what a claim-level audit looks like, and whether an abstract can support a claim.",7,{"path":137,"heading":138,"description":139,"order":140},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fyou-described-a-result-too-broadly","How do I fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly?","How to fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly, which parts of a claim drift away from the evidence, and how to hedge without sounding unsure.",8,{"path":142,"heading":143,"description":144,"order":145},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fjournal-page-number-or-pdf-page-number","Do I use the journal page number or the PDF page number in a citation?","Which page number belongs in a citation when the PDF numbering differs, whether paraphrases need page numbers, and how to cite a source that has no pages at all.",9,{"path":147,"heading":148,"description":149,"order":150},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fquoting-a-source-in-another-language","How do I quote a source in another language in an English thesis?","How to quote a non-English source in an English thesis, whether to give the original or the translation or both, and how to cite a translation you made yourself.",10,{"path":152,"heading":153,"description":154,"order":155},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fhow-much-self-citation","How much self-citation is acceptable?","How much self-citation is acceptable in a paper or thesis, whether editors and reviewers flag it, and how to cite your own unpublished or in-progress work.",11,{"path":157,"heading":158,"description":159,"order":160},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fzotero-or-mendeley","Should I use Zotero or Mendeley for a PhD?","How to choose between Zotero and Mendeley for doctoral work, how to migrate a library from one to the other, and how to stop duplicate references accumulating.",12,[162,165,168,171,174,177,180,183,186,189,192,195,198,201,204,207,210,213,216,219,222,225,228,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,246,249,252,255,257,260,263,266,269,272,275,278,281,284,287,290,293,296,299,302,305,308,311,314,317,320,323,326,329,332,335,338,341,344,347,350,353,356,359,362,365,368,371,374,377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404,407,410,413,416,419,422,425,428,431,434],{"path":163,"heading":164},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fdraft-without-stopping-for-citations","How do I draft when I keep stopping to look up citations?",{"path":166,"heading":167},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fhow-long-should-a-literature-review-chapter-be","How long should a literature review chapter be?",{"path":169,"heading":170},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fparaphrase-without-plagiarizing","How do I paraphrase a source without plagiarizing?",{"path":172,"heading":173},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fstructure-a-phd-thesis","How do I structure a PhD thesis chapter by chapter?",{"path":175,"heading":176},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fthesis-by-publication-or-monograph","Should I do a thesis by publication or a monograph?",{"path":178,"heading":179},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-discussion-section","How do I write a discussion section without repeating the results?",{"path":181,"heading":182},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-methodology-chapter","How do I write a methodology chapter?",{"path":184,"heading":185},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-thesis-introduction","How do I write a thesis introduction?",{"path":187,"heading":188},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-an-abstract","How do I write an abstract for a research paper?",{"path":190,"heading":191},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-consistently-during-a-phd","How do I write consistently during a PhD?",{"path":193,"heading":194},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fai-for-systematic-review-screening","Can I use AI for screening in a systematic review?",{"path":196,"heading":197},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fare-ai-detectors-reliable","Are AI detectors reliable?",{"path":199,"heading":200},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-an-ai-be-an-author","Can an AI tool be listed as an author on a paper?",{"path":202,"heading":203},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-i-use-ai-for-a-literature-review","Can I use AI for a literature review?",{"path":205,"heading":206},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","Can I trust AI summaries of research papers?",{"path":208,"heading":209},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fdisclose-ai-use-in-a-paper","Do I need to disclose AI use in a research paper?",{"path":211,"heading":212},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fhow-to-cite-chatgpt","How do I cite ChatGPT in APA 7?",{"path":214,"heading":215},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fis-using-chatgpt-plagiarism","Is using ChatGPT for academic writing plagiarism?",{"path":217,"heading":218},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-in-a-phd-thesis","Can I use AI in a PhD thesis?",{"path":220,"heading":221},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-to-write-a-peer-review","Can I use AI to help write a peer review?",{"path":223,"heading":224},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fverify-ai-generated-citations","How do I check whether AI-generated citations are real?",{"path":226,"heading":227},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-ai-answers-better-on-your-own-pdfs","Why does an AI answer better when it reads my own PDFs?",{"path":229,"heading":230},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-chatgpt-invents-references","Why does ChatGPT make up references?",{"path":132,"heading":133},{"path":117,"heading":118},{"path":127,"heading":128},{"path":122,"heading":123},{"path":87,"heading":75},{"path":108,"heading":109},{"path":152,"heading":153},{"path":142,"heading":143},{"path":147,"heading":148},{"path":113,"heading":114},{"path":137,"heading":138},{"path":157,"heading":158},{"path":244,"heading":245},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fbuild-a-synthesis-matrix","How do I build a synthesis matrix when my themes keep changing as I read?",{"path":247,"heading":248},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fkeep-a-literature-review-current","How do I keep a literature review current over a multi-year PhD?",{"path":250,"heading":251},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-synthesis-or-summary","How do I know if my literature review is synthesis or just a summary?",{"path":253,"heading":254},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-too-descriptive","What does it mean when a supervisor says a literature review is too descriptive?",{"path":91,"heading":256},"What is the difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review?",{"path":258,"heading":259},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Forganize-literature-review-by-argument","How do I organize a literature review by argument instead of by paper?",{"path":261,"heading":262},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Freview-that-leads-to-your-question","How do I write a literature review that leads logically to my research question?",{"path":264,"heading":265},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fscreening-abstracts-for-a-review","How do I screen hundreds of abstracts for a systematic review?",{"path":267,"heading":268},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fstudies-with-opposite-conclusions","What do I write when two studies on the same question reach opposite conclusions?",{"path":270,"heading":271},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsynthesis-matrix-into-paragraphs","How do I turn a synthesis matrix into literature review paragraphs?",{"path":273,"heading":274},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsystematic-review-search-strategy","How do I build a search strategy for a systematic review?",{"path":276,"heading":277},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fwhen-to-stop-searching-for-papers","How do I know when to stop searching for papers for a literature review?",{"path":279,"heading":280},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fdefend-your-methodology-in-a-viva","How do I defend my methodology in a viva?",{"path":282,"heading":283},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fimposter-syndrome-in-a-phd","How do I deal with imposter syndrome during a PhD?",{"path":285,"heading":286},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fplan-a-realistic-phd-timeline","How do I plan a realistic PhD timeline?",{"path":288,"heading":289},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fpostdoc-or-industry","Should I do a postdoc or go to industry after my PhD?",{"path":291,"heading":292},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fprepare-for-a-phd-viva","How do I prepare for a PhD viva?",{"path":294,"heading":295},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fstop-procrastinating-on-your-phd","How do I stop procrastinating on my PhD?",{"path":297,"heading":298},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhat-happens-if-a-viva-goes-badly","What happens if you fail a PhD viva?",{"path":300,"heading":301},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhen-your-supervisor-is-not-supportive","What do I do when my PhD supervisor is not supportive?",{"path":303,"heading":304},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwrite-an-academic-cv","How do I write an academic CV for a postdoc application?",{"path":306,"heading":307},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fchoose-a-journal","How do I choose a journal for my paper?",{"path":309,"heading":310},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fdo-you-pay-to-publish-open-access","Do I have to pay to publish open access?",{"path":312,"heading":313},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-author-order-is-decided","How is author order decided on a paper?",{"path":315,"heading":316},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-peer-review-works","How does journal peer review actually work?",{"path":318,"heading":319},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-to-cite-a-preprint","How do I cite a preprint?",{"path":321,"heading":322},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fjournal-submission-cover-letter","How do I write a cover letter for a journal submission?",{"path":324,"heading":325},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","How do I respond to peer reviewer comments?",{"path":327,"heading":328},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","Should I post my paper as a preprint?",{"path":330,"heading":331},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fspot-a-predatory-journal","How do I tell if a journal is predatory?",{"path":333,"heading":334},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fwhy-papers-get-desk-rejected","Why was my paper desk rejected?",{"path":336,"heading":337},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ffind-the-paper-you-half-remember","How do I find a paper when I only remember the argument it made?",{"path":339,"heading":340},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhighlighting-pdfs-stops-working","Why can I never find my PDF highlights again?",{"path":342,"heading":343},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhow-many-papers-can-you-read-a-day","How many papers can a PhD student realistically read in a day?",{"path":345,"heading":346},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fkeep-up-with-new-papers","How do I keep up with new papers without reading everything?",{"path":348,"heading":349},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnon-english-studies-in-a-review","How do I include non-English studies in a literature review?",{"path":351,"heading":352},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnote-system-takes-too-long","What do I do when my note-taking system takes longer than reading the papers?",{"path":354,"heading":355},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Forganize-100-papers","How do I organize and extract information from more than 100 papers?",{"path":357,"heading":358},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Freading-papers-in-a-second-language","How do I read research papers efficiently when English is my second language?",{"path":360,"heading":361},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fremember-what-a-paper-said","How do I remember what was in papers I read months ago?",{"path":363,"heading":364},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Frestart-a-project-after-months-away","How do I get back into a research project after months away?",{"path":366,"heading":367},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftrack-connections-between-papers","How do I keep track of connections between papers?",{"path":369,"heading":370},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftriage-pdfs-before-reading","How do I triage 200 PDFs before deciding which ones to read in full?",{"path":372,"heading":373},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fanonymize-qualitative-data","How do I anonymize qualitative interview data?",{"path":375,"heading":376},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Ffair-data-principles-in-practice","What are the FAIR data principles?",{"path":378,"heading":379},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Forganize-research-data-files","How do I organize research data files?",{"path":381,"heading":382},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwhat-preregistration-is","What is preregistration in research?",{"path":384,"heading":385},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwrite-a-data-management-plan","How do I write a data management plan?",{"path":387,"heading":388},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fchoose-a-theoretical-framework","How do I choose a theoretical framework for my thesis?",{"path":390,"heading":391},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Ffind-a-research-gap","How do I identify a research gap in the literature?",{"path":393,"heading":394},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original","How do I know if my research gap is original?",{"path":396,"heading":397},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fnarrow-a-broad-research-question","How do I narrow down a research question that is too broad?",{"path":399,"heading":400},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-changed-mid-phd","Can a research question change during a PhD?",{"path":402,"heading":403},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-or-hypothesis","What is the difference between a research question and a hypothesis?",{"path":405,"heading":406},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fturn-a-topic-into-a-research-question","How do I turn a research topic into a research question?",{"path":408,"heading":409},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwhat-makes-a-good-research-question","What makes a good research question in a PhD thesis?",{"path":411,"heading":412},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwrite-a-research-gap-statement","How do I write a research gap statement?",{"path":414,"heading":415},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fchoose-a-statistical-test","How do I choose which statistical test to use?",{"path":417,"heading":418},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-many-interviews-is-enough","How many interviews are enough for a qualitative study?",{"path":420,"heading":421},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-to-do-thematic-analysis","How do I do thematic analysis step by step?",{"path":423,"heading":424},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Finductive-or-deductive-coding","What is the difference between inductive and deductive thematic analysis?",{"path":426,"heading":427},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fintegrate-mixed-methods-data","How do I integrate qualitative and quantitative data in a mixed methods study?",{"path":429,"heading":430},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Frigour-in-qualitative-research","How do I show rigour in qualitative research?",{"path":432,"heading":433},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwhat-a-p-value-means","What does a p value actually mean?",{"path":435,"heading":436},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwork-out-your-sample-size","How do I calculate the sample size for a study?",1786014768231]