[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":440},["ShallowReactive",2],{"answers-\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary":3,"answers-cluster-ai-in-research":107,"answers-related-\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary":167},{"id":4,"title":5,"answer":6,"body":7,"cluster":66,"description":67,"extension":68,"faq":69,"heading":72,"intro":60,"kind":73,"meta":74,"navigation":75,"order":76,"outbound":77,"path":84,"primaryQuery":85,"product":86,"related":90,"seo":93,"sources":94,"stem":105,"updated":98,"__hash__":106},"answers\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary.md","Can You Trust an AI Summary of a Research Paper?","Trust them to tell you what a paper is about, not what it established. Summaries are reliable for triage and unreliable for detail, because the parts most often dropped are exactly the parts that decide whether a finding supports your claim: the population, the conditions, and the hedging.",{"type":8,"value":9,"toc":59},"minimark",[10,14,17,20,23,26,29,34,37,40,43,47,50,53,56],[11,12,13],"p",{},"The useful distinction is between a summary that describes a paper and one that reports its findings. Describing is easy and reliable: this is a longitudinal study of teacher retention using a national sample. Reporting is harder and is where errors concentrate, because a finding is a claim with conditions attached and summarization works by removing detail.",[11,15,16],{},"That gives you a usable rule. Summaries are safe for deciding whether to read something and for reminding yourself what a paper covered. They are not safe as the basis for a sentence in your thesis, because the sentence needs the conditions the summary removed.",[11,18,19],{},"The failure is usually not fabrication. It is compression in the direction of confidence, which is what summarization does to any hedged text, and academic writing is unusually hedged. A finding reported as holding \"in this sample, under these conditions, with a small effect size\" becomes \"the study found that X improves Y\".",[11,21,22],{},"There is evidence that looking right and being right are separate properties. Gao and colleagues gave ChatGPT only the titles and journal names of 50 medical papers from Nature Medicine, JAMA, NEJM, BMJ and Lancet, and asked for abstracts in each journal's style. The model could not read the papers, and its knowledge cutoff predated them. Every output looked like a scientific abstract, and the invented cohort sizes tracked the real ones closely enough to correlate at r = 0.76, but the numbers were generated rather than recovered from the studies, and only 16% of the outputs followed the requested journal's formatting (Gao et al., 2023, pp. 1-2, 4). That is a test of surface plausibility, not of faithful condensation, so read it as a warning about how convincing wrong output can be rather than as a measurement of summary accuracy.",[11,24,25],{},"Your own judgment is a weaker check than it feels. Four blinded reviewers in that study caught 68% of the generated abstracts and correctly passed 86% of the real ones, which means they accepted roughly a third of the fabrications and wrongly flagged 14% of genuine abstracts as machine written. They described the texts they suspected as vaguer and more formulaic, but detector scores did not differ significantly between the fabrications they caught and the ones they missed, p = 0.45 (Gao et al., 2023, pp. 1-2). Reading a summary and asking whether it feels off is not a verification step.",[11,27,28],{},"There is a second effect worth knowing about. A summary of a paper you have not read gives you the feeling of having read it, and that feeling is durable. Six months later you will remember the claim and not remember that you never opened the source.",[30,31,33],"h2",{"id":32},"what-do-summarizers-systematically-get-wrong","What do summarizers systematically get wrong?",[11,35,36],{},"Four things. They drop the conditions a finding depended on. They flatten hedged claims into confident ones. They report what a paper discusses as what it found. And they lose the authors' own stated limitations, which is usually the most useful section for a critical reader.",[11,38,39],{},"The third of those is the sneakiest. Papers spend most of their length discussing other people's work, and a summary that does not distinguish between what a paper argues and what it merely reports will attribute the literature to the author.",[11,41,42],{},"Methodological detail is the fifth casualty, and it matters because two studies with the same headline finding can differ in ways that make one usable for your argument and the other not.",[30,44,46],{"id":45},"how-do-i-check-a-summary-quickly","How do I check a summary quickly?",[11,48,49],{},"Read the abstract and the first paragraph of the discussion, which takes about ninety seconds, and compare. Then check one specific thing the summary asserts against the results section. If the summary is accurate on the specific thing, it is usually accurate overall.",[11,51,52],{},"The abstract and discussion pairing works because the abstract states the finding as the authors want it stated, and the discussion opening states what they think it means. Between them you can see whether the summary is calibrated.",[11,54,55],{},"Check the references the summary hands you as well as the claims. Helmy and colleagues note that newer tools have improved on factual accuracy but that fabricated information persists, and fake references and citations are the form that persists most. Their sixth rule is to refine the prompt, look at more than one output, and cross-verify every AI-generated insight against empirical evidence, domain expertise or established knowledge before using it (Helmy et al., 2025, pp. 2-3, 9). Their framing is guidance rather than a measured accuracy trial, so treat it as a working procedure, not as a number you can quote.",[11,57,58],{},"For anything you intend to cite, skip the check and read the relevant section. Verification of a summary is worth doing when the paper is peripheral. When it is central, the summary was never the right tool.",{"title":60,"searchDepth":61,"depth":61,"links":62},"",4,[63,65],{"id":32,"depth":64,"text":33},2,{"id":45,"depth":64,"text":46},"ai-in-research","How reliable AI summaries of research papers are, what summarizers systematically get wrong, and how to check a summary in under two minutes.","md",[70,71],{"q":33,"a":36},{"q":46,"a":49},"Can I trust AI summaries of research papers?","answer",{},true,9,[78,81],{"label":79,"to":80},"Retrieval across a curated corpus","\u002Fdocs\u002Fcore-concepts\u002Frag-and-retrieval",{"label":82,"to":83},"Why academic PDF ingestion is hard","\u002Fblog\u002Fgraphrag-one-llm-extraction-pass","\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","can i trust ai summaries of research papers",{"text":87,"to":88,"label":89},"Agent Bayes builds its summary of a paper as a set of points that each link back to the passage they came from, so checking one means clicking it rather than rereading the paper. The link is to the printed page, which is the same reference that goes into your bibliography.","\u002Fdocs\u002Fgetting-started\u002Fthe-interface","See how source-linked points work",[91,92],"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftriage-pdfs-before-reading","\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fyou-described-a-result-too-broadly",{"title":5,"description":67},[95,99,102],{"label":96,"url":97,"checked":98},"Smith et al., Hallucination or Confabulation? Neuroanatomy as metaphor in Large Language Models, PLOS Digital Health (2023)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pdig.0000388","2026-08-06",{"label":100,"url":101,"checked":98},"Gao et al., Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers, npj Digital Medicine (2023)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1038\u002Fs41746-023-00819-6",{"label":103,"url":104,"checked":98},"Helmy et al., Ten simple rules for optimal and careful use of generative AI in science, PLoS Computational Biology (2025)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pcbi.1013588","answers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-you-trust-an-ai-summary","iqddbc0uo1axf_Rpl7fV3d6DFeEUYPgZndv43wTFEDY",[108,113,117,122,126,131,136,141,146,147,152,157,162],{"path":109,"heading":110,"description":111,"order":112},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-chatgpt-invents-references","Why does ChatGPT make up references?","Why language models produce citations to papers that do not exist, what published studies measured about how often it happens, and how to check a reference fast.",1,{"path":114,"heading":115,"description":116,"order":64},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-i-use-ai-for-a-literature-review","Can I use AI for a literature review?","Whether AI can be used for a literature review, which parts of the process it genuinely helps with, and which parts have to stay human to survive examination.",{"path":118,"heading":119,"description":120,"order":121},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fis-using-chatgpt-plagiarism","Is using ChatGPT for academic writing plagiarism?","Whether using ChatGPT in academic writing counts as plagiarism, where the line between editing and generating falls, and what university policies typically say.",3,{"path":123,"heading":124,"description":125,"order":61},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fdisclose-ai-use-in-a-paper","Do I need to disclose AI use in a research paper?","When AI use must be disclosed in a research paper, what the major publishers require and where the statement goes, and which uses are exempt from declaration.",{"path":127,"heading":128,"description":129,"order":130},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fcan-an-ai-be-an-author","Can an AI tool be listed as an author on a paper?","Whether an AI tool can be named as an author on a research paper, what COPE and ICMJE say about it, and how to credit AI assistance properly instead.",5,{"path":132,"heading":133,"description":134,"order":135},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fare-ai-detectors-reliable","Are AI detectors reliable?","What published studies found about AI text detector accuracy, why detectors flag non-native English writers more often, and what to do if your writing is flagged.",6,{"path":137,"heading":138,"description":139,"order":140},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fhow-to-cite-chatgpt","How do I cite ChatGPT in APA 7?","How to cite ChatGPT and other AI tools in APA 7, MLA 9, and Chicago style, and whether a chat should be cited at all or described in the methods instead.",7,{"path":142,"heading":143,"description":144,"order":145},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fverify-ai-generated-citations","How do I check whether AI-generated citations are real?","How to verify AI-generated citations in a few minutes, what a fabricated reference usually looks like, and how to confirm the source says what was claimed.",8,{"path":84,"heading":72,"description":67,"order":76},{"path":148,"heading":149,"description":150,"order":151},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-in-a-phd-thesis","Can I use AI in a PhD thesis?","Whether AI can be used in a doctoral thesis, what university policies typically permit and require, and how to raise the question with your supervisor.",10,{"path":153,"heading":154,"description":155,"order":156},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fai-for-systematic-review-screening","Can I use AI for screening in a systematic review?","Whether AI can be used to screen studies in a systematic review, what reporting guidelines require you to declare, and how to validate an automated screening step.",11,{"path":158,"heading":159,"description":160,"order":161},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fwhy-ai-answers-better-on-your-own-pdfs","Why does an AI answer better when it reads my own PDFs?","Why an AI gives better answers when it works from documents you supplied, what retrieval is and why it reduces fabrication, and whether it removes errors entirely.",12,{"path":163,"heading":164,"description":165,"order":166},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fai-in-research\u002Fusing-ai-to-write-a-peer-review","Can I use AI to help write a peer review?","Whether AI can be used to help write a peer review, what uploading an unpublished manuscript to a chatbot risks, and what publishers and funders currently allow.",13,[168,171,174,177,180,183,186,189,192,195,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,214,217,220,223,226,229,232,235,238,241,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264,267,270,273,276,279,282,285,288,291,294,297,300,303,306,309,312,315,318,321,324,327,330,333,336,339,342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369,372,374,377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404,407,410,413,416,419,422,425,428,431,434,437],{"path":169,"heading":170},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fdraft-without-stopping-for-citations","How do I draft when I keep stopping to look up citations?",{"path":172,"heading":173},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fhow-long-should-a-literature-review-chapter-be","How long should a literature review chapter be?",{"path":175,"heading":176},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fparaphrase-without-plagiarizing","How do I paraphrase a source without plagiarizing?",{"path":178,"heading":179},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fstructure-a-phd-thesis","How do I structure a PhD thesis chapter by chapter?",{"path":181,"heading":182},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fthesis-by-publication-or-monograph","Should I do a thesis by publication or a monograph?",{"path":184,"heading":185},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-discussion-section","How do I write a discussion section without repeating the results?",{"path":187,"heading":188},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-methodology-chapter","How do I write a methodology chapter?",{"path":190,"heading":191},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-a-thesis-introduction","How do I write a thesis introduction?",{"path":193,"heading":194},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-an-abstract","How do I write an abstract for a research paper?",{"path":196,"heading":197},"\u002Fanswers\u002Facademic-writing\u002Fwrite-consistently-during-a-phd","How do I write consistently during a PhD?",{"path":153,"heading":154},{"path":132,"heading":133},{"path":127,"heading":128},{"path":114,"heading":115},{"path":84,"heading":72},{"path":123,"heading":124},{"path":137,"heading":138},{"path":118,"heading":119},{"path":148,"heading":149},{"path":163,"heading":164},{"path":142,"heading":143},{"path":158,"heading":159},{"path":109,"heading":110},{"path":212,"heading":213},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcheck-every-claim-against-its-citation","How do I check that every claim in my thesis is supported by its citation?",{"path":215,"heading":216},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcite-the-paper-you-read-or-the-original","Should I cite the paper I read or the original study it references?",{"path":218,"heading":219},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fcited-source-does-not-say-that","What do I do when a paper's cited source does not support its claim?",{"path":221,"heading":222},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-paper-you-cannot-access","Can I cite a paper I cannot get hold of?",{"path":224,"heading":225},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fciting-a-review-instead-of-the-original","Is citing a review instead of the original research bad practice?",{"path":227,"heading":228},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fdo-i-need-to-cite-everything","Do I need to cite absolutely everything in a thesis?",{"path":230,"heading":231},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fhow-much-self-citation","How much self-citation is acceptable?",{"path":233,"heading":234},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fjournal-page-number-or-pdf-page-number","Do I use the journal page number or the PDF page number in a citation?",{"path":236,"heading":237},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fquoting-a-source-in-another-language","How do I quote a source in another language in an English thesis?",{"path":239,"heading":240},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fwhere-does-the-citation-go","Where should a citation go when only one clause in a sentence needs support?",{"path":92,"heading":242},"How do I fix a sentence that describes a study's result too broadly?",{"path":244,"heading":245},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fcitations\u002Fzotero-or-mendeley","Should I use Zotero or Mendeley for a PhD?",{"path":247,"heading":248},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fbuild-a-synthesis-matrix","How do I build a synthesis matrix when my themes keep changing as I read?",{"path":250,"heading":251},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fkeep-a-literature-review-current","How do I keep a literature review current over a multi-year PhD?",{"path":253,"heading":254},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-synthesis-or-summary","How do I know if my literature review is synthesis or just a summary?",{"path":256,"heading":257},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fliterature-review-too-descriptive","What does it mean when a supervisor says a literature review is too descriptive?",{"path":259,"heading":260},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fnarrative-scoping-or-systematic-review","What is the difference between a narrative literature review and a systematic review?",{"path":262,"heading":263},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Forganize-literature-review-by-argument","How do I organize a literature review by argument instead of by paper?",{"path":265,"heading":266},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Freview-that-leads-to-your-question","How do I write a literature review that leads logically to my research question?",{"path":268,"heading":269},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fscreening-abstracts-for-a-review","How do I screen hundreds of abstracts for a systematic review?",{"path":271,"heading":272},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fstudies-with-opposite-conclusions","What do I write when two studies on the same question reach opposite conclusions?",{"path":274,"heading":275},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsynthesis-matrix-into-paragraphs","How do I turn a synthesis matrix into literature review paragraphs?",{"path":277,"heading":278},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fsystematic-review-search-strategy","How do I build a search strategy for a systematic review?",{"path":280,"heading":281},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fliterature-review\u002Fwhen-to-stop-searching-for-papers","How do I know when to stop searching for papers for a literature review?",{"path":283,"heading":284},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fdefend-your-methodology-in-a-viva","How do I defend my methodology in a viva?",{"path":286,"heading":287},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fimposter-syndrome-in-a-phd","How do I deal with imposter syndrome during a PhD?",{"path":289,"heading":290},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fplan-a-realistic-phd-timeline","How do I plan a realistic PhD timeline?",{"path":292,"heading":293},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fpostdoc-or-industry","Should I do a postdoc or go to industry after my PhD?",{"path":295,"heading":296},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fprepare-for-a-phd-viva","How do I prepare for a PhD viva?",{"path":298,"heading":299},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fstop-procrastinating-on-your-phd","How do I stop procrastinating on my PhD?",{"path":301,"heading":302},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhat-happens-if-a-viva-goes-badly","What happens if you fail a PhD viva?",{"path":304,"heading":305},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwhen-your-supervisor-is-not-supportive","What do I do when my PhD supervisor is not supportive?",{"path":307,"heading":308},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fphd-life\u002Fwrite-an-academic-cv","How do I write an academic CV for a postdoc application?",{"path":310,"heading":311},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fchoose-a-journal","How do I choose a journal for my paper?",{"path":313,"heading":314},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fdo-you-pay-to-publish-open-access","Do I have to pay to publish open access?",{"path":316,"heading":317},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-author-order-is-decided","How is author order decided on a paper?",{"path":319,"heading":320},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-peer-review-works","How does journal peer review actually work?",{"path":322,"heading":323},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fhow-to-cite-a-preprint","How do I cite a preprint?",{"path":325,"heading":326},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fjournal-submission-cover-letter","How do I write a cover letter for a journal submission?",{"path":328,"heading":329},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Frespond-to-reviewer-comments","How do I respond to peer reviewer comments?",{"path":331,"heading":332},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fshould-you-post-a-preprint","Should I post my paper as a preprint?",{"path":334,"heading":335},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fspot-a-predatory-journal","How do I tell if a journal is predatory?",{"path":337,"heading":338},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fpublishing\u002Fwhy-papers-get-desk-rejected","Why was my paper desk rejected?",{"path":340,"heading":341},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ffind-the-paper-you-half-remember","How do I find a paper when I only remember the argument it made?",{"path":343,"heading":344},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhighlighting-pdfs-stops-working","Why can I never find my PDF highlights again?",{"path":346,"heading":347},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fhow-many-papers-can-you-read-a-day","How many papers can a PhD student realistically read in a day?",{"path":349,"heading":350},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fkeep-up-with-new-papers","How do I keep up with new papers without reading everything?",{"path":352,"heading":353},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnon-english-studies-in-a-review","How do I include non-English studies in a literature review?",{"path":355,"heading":356},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fnote-system-takes-too-long","What do I do when my note-taking system takes longer than reading the papers?",{"path":358,"heading":359},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Forganize-100-papers","How do I organize and extract information from more than 100 papers?",{"path":361,"heading":362},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Freading-papers-in-a-second-language","How do I read research papers efficiently when English is my second language?",{"path":364,"heading":365},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Fremember-what-a-paper-said","How do I remember what was in papers I read months ago?",{"path":367,"heading":368},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Frestart-a-project-after-months-away","How do I get back into a research project after months away?",{"path":370,"heading":371},"\u002Fanswers\u002Freading-and-notes\u002Ftrack-connections-between-papers","How do I keep track of connections between papers?",{"path":91,"heading":373},"How do I triage 200 PDFs before deciding which ones to read in full?",{"path":375,"heading":376},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fanonymize-qualitative-data","How do I anonymize qualitative interview data?",{"path":378,"heading":379},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Ffair-data-principles-in-practice","What are the FAIR data principles?",{"path":381,"heading":382},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Forganize-research-data-files","How do I organize research data files?",{"path":384,"heading":385},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwhat-preregistration-is","What is preregistration in research?",{"path":387,"heading":388},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-data\u002Fwrite-a-data-management-plan","How do I write a data management plan?",{"path":390,"heading":391},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fchoose-a-theoretical-framework","How do I choose a theoretical framework for my thesis?",{"path":393,"heading":394},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Ffind-a-research-gap","How do I identify a research gap in the literature?",{"path":396,"heading":397},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fis-my-research-gap-original","How do I know if my research gap is original?",{"path":399,"heading":400},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fnarrow-a-broad-research-question","How do I narrow down a research question that is too broad?",{"path":402,"heading":403},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-changed-mid-phd","Can a research question change during a PhD?",{"path":405,"heading":406},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fresearch-question-or-hypothesis","What is the difference between a research question and a hypothesis?",{"path":408,"heading":409},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fturn-a-topic-into-a-research-question","How do I turn a research topic into a research question?",{"path":411,"heading":412},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwhat-makes-a-good-research-question","What makes a good research question in a PhD thesis?",{"path":414,"heading":415},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-gaps\u002Fwrite-a-research-gap-statement","How do I write a research gap statement?",{"path":417,"heading":418},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fchoose-a-statistical-test","How do I choose which statistical test to use?",{"path":420,"heading":421},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-many-interviews-is-enough","How many interviews are enough for a qualitative study?",{"path":423,"heading":424},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fhow-to-do-thematic-analysis","How do I do thematic analysis step by step?",{"path":426,"heading":427},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Finductive-or-deductive-coding","What is the difference between inductive and deductive thematic analysis?",{"path":429,"heading":430},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fintegrate-mixed-methods-data","How do I integrate qualitative and quantitative data in a mixed methods study?",{"path":432,"heading":433},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Frigour-in-qualitative-research","How do I show rigour in qualitative research?",{"path":435,"heading":436},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwhat-a-p-value-means","What does a p value actually mean?",{"path":438,"heading":439},"\u002Fanswers\u002Fresearch-methods\u002Fwork-out-your-sample-size","How do I calculate the sample size for a study?",1786014768691]